ADAM OLSEN: As the Minister succinctly responds to MLA John Rustad – government doesn’t intend to protect much
Budget Estimates is an oft-overlooked aspect of our work in the
legislature.
Once legislators have passed the budget the debate moves to Estimates.
This is an opportunity for members of the opposition to ask direct questions to
the Minister about their budget.
In reality, the questions are wide ranging and rarely stick to just the
current budget cycle. This opportunity gives members of the opposition time to
dig in and ask about the philosophical approach of the Minister and government.
During Estimates the Minister has the full support of their senior staff.
The Estimates schedule is up to the government, but the annual budget
cycle is not complete until these votes pass for each Ministry.
These debates are extremely slow moving. A Member asks a question, the
Minister convenes with senior staff, then the Minister answers the question,
and a Member asks the next question. Needless to say, it is not as exciting as
the theatre of Question Period, so fewer people watch it. But it is no less
important!
All of these discussions are on the record on Hansard. They capture
important exchanges where the opposition has the space and time to press a
Minister when they fail to provide a clear answer (or response).
The wrong direction
So, with that background, here are two troubling responses from Hon.
Doug Donaldson (Minister of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and
Rural Development) to questions from BC Liberal MLA John Rustad about the BC
NDP's approach to the protection of coastal old-growth.
As the Ancient Forest Alliance pointed out in their
advocacy with our caucus, coastal old-growth stands on BC’s coast are not a
renewable resource – it takes 200 years for second-growth forests to begin to
display some old-growth characteristics.
On the South Coast 75% of these forests have already been logged. That
includes over 90% of the high-productivity valley bottoms. High productive
old-growth is essential for salmon, for carbon sequestration and watershed
health. That’s why calls to protect these precious stands have been escalating.
As the Minister succinctly responds to MLA Rustad – government doesn’t
intend to protect much.
Further, I have been in meetings with the "environmental
organizations" whose interest is in "protecting old-growth forests to
a larger extent." They have been exceptionally clear with us that they
have been explicitly clear with government.
In other words, there should be no confusion about their desire to
protect the remaining high productivity old-growth on the British Columbia
coast.
And, the 13,000 emails I have received in two years from British
Columbians suggest the government is on the wrong track on this issue.
In that light, Minister Donaldson's answer is incredibly disappointing.
Adam Olsen is the Member of the Legislative
Assembly of British Columbia for Saanich North and the Islands
Born in Victoria, BC in 1976, Adam has lived,
worked and played his entire life on the Saanich Peninsula.
He is a member of Tsartlip First Nation (W̱JOȽEȽP), where he and his wife, Emily, are raising their
two children, Silas and Ella.
Exchange from Thursday March 28, 2019 (5:35pm)
J. Rustad:
For the
little bit of time remaining that we have in some questions today, I actually want
to talk a little bit about some of the coastal issues, just from a staff
perspective. The first question to the minister associated with coastal issues
is: is the minister considering a moratorium on old-growth logging?
Hon. D. Donaldson:
We're not
considering a moratorium on old-growth logging.
J. Rustad:
Boy, if only
questions could be that quick and answered on both sides, we'd be through this
in a day or two.
Obviously,
there's a significant amount of old growth that has already been protected
within the coast, particularly on the Island, but there still is old growth
that is a significant part of the fibre basket that feeds the 15 million or
thereabouts cubic metres per year that is harvested on the coast.
Does the
minister anticipate or see within this upcoming budget any changes to the
amount of old-growth fibre that would be continually contributing towards the
annual allowable cut?
Hon. D. Donaldson:
Currently
second growth on the coast comprises about 46 percent of the harvest. So second
growth is a significant contributor to the annual allowable cut. I've met with
environmental organizations that are interested in our approach to old-growth
management. It was addressed, to some degree, in a coast process that we had
about increased fibre utilization of what we're actually harvesting that will
actually contribute more fibre to mills and to pulp mills as well.
The
old-growth component of forests on the coast obviously contributes
significantly to the annual allowable cut. We are engaging with those who are
interested in protecting old-growth forests to a larger extent. We're drilling
down to come up with the kinds of values that they attach to old-growth
forests. If it's a tourism value, then there could be options around retention
of certain trees.
If it has to
do with other factors, then that's what we want to know. But as far as this
government is concerned, there will be sustainable harvesting in old-growth
forests on the coast.
Comments
Post a Comment