Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: How are parliamentarians supposed to digest, debate and deal with the massive pottage of bills unrelated to the budget? AND ... it’s troubling our government appears to be committed to doing everything proposed by the UN


The Government’s Omnibus Bill, C-97 - Budget Implementation Act, 2019, #1 contains a National Housing Strategy Act which states:
  • Whereas a national housing strategy would contribute to meeting the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations;
  • And whereas a national housing strategy would support the progressive realization of the right to adequate housing as recognized in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, to which Canada is a party;


The legislation sets lofty goals to improve the available housing in Canada but is silent on who will pay for reaching those goals. The federal government makes no commitment to fund its UN driven ideals. 

In addition, provinces have jurisdiction over:
  • The Management and Sale of the Public Lands belonging to the Province and of the Timber and Wood thereon; and
  • Generally, all Matters of a merely local or private Nature in the Province.

The federal government does not have the constitutional power to regulate provincial housing.   

Bill C-97 also contains the Poverty Reduction Act which states:
  • Whereas Canada aspires to be a world leader in the eradication of poverty;
  • And whereas the progress made by Canada in the reduction of poverty contributes to meeting the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations;

The legislation sets out lofty goals:
6 The targets for poverty reduction in Canada to which the Government of Canada aspires are the following:
(a) 20% below the level of poverty in 2015 by 2020; and
(b) 50% below the level of poverty in 2015 by 2030.

Once again, there is nothing tangible as to how those goals are to be underwritten (paid for) or how they are to be achieved. Targets the government aspires to are opaque and meaningless. Aspiring to something is not a commitment to action, but the outline of a dream.

It is troubling that our government appears to be committed to doing everything proposed by the United Nations. If so, dissolve parliament and save us the costs of a useless institution that cannot reason or think for itself or act in the best interests of Canadians.

BILL C-97 ALSO HAS 9 pages of summary, 12 pages of provisions and 367 pages of text dealing with:


  1. the Income Tax Act,
  2. GST/HST Measures,
  3. Strengthening Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorist Financing Regime,
  4. Employment Equity Act,
  5. Canada Pension Plan,
  6. Old Age Security Act,
  7. Regulatory Modernization,
  8. Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act,
  9. Pilotage Act,
  10. An Act respecting the commercialization of security screening services,
  11. Aviation Industry Indemnity Act,
  12. Transportation Appeal Tribunal of Canada Act,
  13. An Act respecting the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants,
  14. Immigration and Refugee Protection Act,
  15. Federal Courts Act,
  16. National Housing Act,
  17. An Act respecting the reduction of poverty,
  18. Veterans Well-being Act,
  19. Student Loans,
  20. Canada National Parks Act,
  21. Parks Canada Agency Act,
  22. An Act respecting the Department of Indigenous Services,
  23. An Act respecting the Department of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Act, and finally,
  24. An Act to establish a regime for prompt payment for construction work performed for the purposes of a construction project in respect of federal real property or federal immovables.

How are parliamentarians supposed to digest, debate and deal with the massive pottage of bills unrelated to the budget?

It is an attempt to circumvent the standing committees of the Commons who would be dissecting the various Bills included in an orderly fashion.

We should be appalled. When our representatives are not given the opportunity to thoroughly review government initiatives, we can be sure that no good will come of it.

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC’s Forestry Decline Is a Policy Failure, Not a Market Reality -- Forestry Critic Calls for Accountability and Urgent Policy Reset

Conservative Party of BC Forestry Critic, and Kamloops - North Thompson MLA,  Ward Stamer As the Truck Loggers Association convention begins today, BC Conservative Forestry Critic Ward Stamer says British Columbia’s forestry crisis is the result of government mismanagement, not market forces, and that an urgent policy reset is needed to restore certainty, sustainability, and accountability. “For generations, forestry supported families and communities across BC,” said Stamer.  “Today, mills are closing, contractors are parking equipment, and families are being forced to leave home, not because the resource is gone, but because policy has failed.” Government data shows timber shipment values dropped by more than half a billion dollars in the past year, with harvest levels falling by roughly 50 per cent in just four years. At the same time, prolonged permitting timelines, unreliable fibre access, outdated forest inventories, and rising costs have made long-term planning impossib...
Post a Comment
Read more

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more