Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: How are parliamentarians supposed to digest, debate and deal with the massive pottage of bills unrelated to the budget? AND ... it’s troubling our government appears to be committed to doing everything proposed by the UN


The Government’s Omnibus Bill, C-97 - Budget Implementation Act, 2019, #1 contains a National Housing Strategy Act which states:
  • Whereas a national housing strategy would contribute to meeting the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations;
  • And whereas a national housing strategy would support the progressive realization of the right to adequate housing as recognized in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, to which Canada is a party;


The legislation sets lofty goals to improve the available housing in Canada but is silent on who will pay for reaching those goals. The federal government makes no commitment to fund its UN driven ideals. 

In addition, provinces have jurisdiction over:
  • The Management and Sale of the Public Lands belonging to the Province and of the Timber and Wood thereon; and
  • Generally, all Matters of a merely local or private Nature in the Province.

The federal government does not have the constitutional power to regulate provincial housing.   

Bill C-97 also contains the Poverty Reduction Act which states:
  • Whereas Canada aspires to be a world leader in the eradication of poverty;
  • And whereas the progress made by Canada in the reduction of poverty contributes to meeting the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations;

The legislation sets out lofty goals:
6 The targets for poverty reduction in Canada to which the Government of Canada aspires are the following:
(a) 20% below the level of poverty in 2015 by 2020; and
(b) 50% below the level of poverty in 2015 by 2030.

Once again, there is nothing tangible as to how those goals are to be underwritten (paid for) or how they are to be achieved. Targets the government aspires to are opaque and meaningless. Aspiring to something is not a commitment to action, but the outline of a dream.

It is troubling that our government appears to be committed to doing everything proposed by the United Nations. If so, dissolve parliament and save us the costs of a useless institution that cannot reason or think for itself or act in the best interests of Canadians.

BILL C-97 ALSO HAS 9 pages of summary, 12 pages of provisions and 367 pages of text dealing with:


  1. the Income Tax Act,
  2. GST/HST Measures,
  3. Strengthening Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorist Financing Regime,
  4. Employment Equity Act,
  5. Canada Pension Plan,
  6. Old Age Security Act,
  7. Regulatory Modernization,
  8. Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act,
  9. Pilotage Act,
  10. An Act respecting the commercialization of security screening services,
  11. Aviation Industry Indemnity Act,
  12. Transportation Appeal Tribunal of Canada Act,
  13. An Act respecting the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants,
  14. Immigration and Refugee Protection Act,
  15. Federal Courts Act,
  16. National Housing Act,
  17. An Act respecting the reduction of poverty,
  18. Veterans Well-being Act,
  19. Student Loans,
  20. Canada National Parks Act,
  21. Parks Canada Agency Act,
  22. An Act respecting the Department of Indigenous Services,
  23. An Act respecting the Department of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Act, and finally,
  24. An Act to establish a regime for prompt payment for construction work performed for the purposes of a construction project in respect of federal real property or federal immovables.

How are parliamentarians supposed to digest, debate and deal with the massive pottage of bills unrelated to the budget?

It is an attempt to circumvent the standing committees of the Commons who would be dissecting the various Bills included in an orderly fashion.

We should be appalled. When our representatives are not given the opportunity to thoroughly review government initiatives, we can be sure that no good will come of it.

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

GORDON F. D. WILSON: When The Trick Masquerades as The Treat

Thirty-seven years ago, Halloween 1987, I became the leader of the BC Liberal Party.   British Columbia was badly polarized. Social Credit held one side and the NDP the other. It had been twelve years, 1975, since Liberal MLAs Garde Gardom, Pat McGeer, and Alan Williams had walked away from their party to join Social Credit, one year after the lone Progressive Conservative MLA Hugh Curtis had abandoned his party to sit with Bill Bennett, the son and heir apparent to long-serving BC Premier, WAC Bennett.   An unwritten agreement by the biggest Canadian political shareholders, the federal Liberals and Conservatives, decided that if British Columbia was to remain a lucrative franchise from a revenue perspective, they couldn’t risk splitting the electoral vote and electing the real enemy, the NDP, so no resources would be used to finance either a Liberal or Conservative party provincially.   “There are two sides to every street,” I was told by a very prominent Canadian businessman who cont

FORSETH: You Have To Be A Bit Crazy

  Ward and his wife Carleen celebrating his win on election night.   In March of this year, I took on the role of Campaign Manager for BC Conservative candidate Ward Stamer.  It’s the third time I’ve had the opportunity as I took on the role for Peter Sharp in 2013, and for Dennis Giesbrecht in 2020. Now let me tell you, in the past, a BC Conservative campaign team generally consisted of myself, the candidate and one or two helpers – and very little in the way of a campaign budget. Thankfully, a benefit of having spent 30+ years in the broadcast media afforded me the ability to do ad copy and write candidate speeches, and prep both Dennis and Peter to deal with the media – it’s also something I have always enjoyed. That was part of my duties this time around as well, however having a team of a dozen and a half volunteers meant that for the first time we had people available to ID our supporters, put together and install campaign signs, distribute campaign literature, and help out at ou

Rustad will support policy for 'everyday' people, otherwise work to bring down NDP

  Conservative Party of B.C. John Rustad Tuesday (Oct. 29) said his party would support government policies that support "average, everyday working" persons in B.C., but also repeated earlier promises to bring down the B.C. NDP government under Premier David Eby. "If there are things that are moved forward that will improve lives for those people, we would be looking at support it," Rustad said. "But if he's going to carry forward with the destructive policies that he has, then yes, we are going to look at every opportunity possible to bring him down as soon as possible."  CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more