Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: How are parliamentarians supposed to digest, debate and deal with the massive pottage of bills unrelated to the budget? AND ... it’s troubling our government appears to be committed to doing everything proposed by the UN


The Government’s Omnibus Bill, C-97 - Budget Implementation Act, 2019, #1 contains a National Housing Strategy Act which states:
  • Whereas a national housing strategy would contribute to meeting the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations;
  • And whereas a national housing strategy would support the progressive realization of the right to adequate housing as recognized in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, to which Canada is a party;


The legislation sets lofty goals to improve the available housing in Canada but is silent on who will pay for reaching those goals. The federal government makes no commitment to fund its UN driven ideals. 

In addition, provinces have jurisdiction over:
  • The Management and Sale of the Public Lands belonging to the Province and of the Timber and Wood thereon; and
  • Generally, all Matters of a merely local or private Nature in the Province.

The federal government does not have the constitutional power to regulate provincial housing.   

Bill C-97 also contains the Poverty Reduction Act which states:
  • Whereas Canada aspires to be a world leader in the eradication of poverty;
  • And whereas the progress made by Canada in the reduction of poverty contributes to meeting the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations;

The legislation sets out lofty goals:
6 The targets for poverty reduction in Canada to which the Government of Canada aspires are the following:
(a) 20% below the level of poverty in 2015 by 2020; and
(b) 50% below the level of poverty in 2015 by 2030.

Once again, there is nothing tangible as to how those goals are to be underwritten (paid for) or how they are to be achieved. Targets the government aspires to are opaque and meaningless. Aspiring to something is not a commitment to action, but the outline of a dream.

It is troubling that our government appears to be committed to doing everything proposed by the United Nations. If so, dissolve parliament and save us the costs of a useless institution that cannot reason or think for itself or act in the best interests of Canadians.

BILL C-97 ALSO HAS 9 pages of summary, 12 pages of provisions and 367 pages of text dealing with:


  1. the Income Tax Act,
  2. GST/HST Measures,
  3. Strengthening Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorist Financing Regime,
  4. Employment Equity Act,
  5. Canada Pension Plan,
  6. Old Age Security Act,
  7. Regulatory Modernization,
  8. Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act,
  9. Pilotage Act,
  10. An Act respecting the commercialization of security screening services,
  11. Aviation Industry Indemnity Act,
  12. Transportation Appeal Tribunal of Canada Act,
  13. An Act respecting the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants,
  14. Immigration and Refugee Protection Act,
  15. Federal Courts Act,
  16. National Housing Act,
  17. An Act respecting the reduction of poverty,
  18. Veterans Well-being Act,
  19. Student Loans,
  20. Canada National Parks Act,
  21. Parks Canada Agency Act,
  22. An Act respecting the Department of Indigenous Services,
  23. An Act respecting the Department of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Act, and finally,
  24. An Act to establish a regime for prompt payment for construction work performed for the purposes of a construction project in respect of federal real property or federal immovables.

How are parliamentarians supposed to digest, debate and deal with the massive pottage of bills unrelated to the budget?

It is an attempt to circumvent the standing committees of the Commons who would be dissecting the various Bills included in an orderly fashion.

We should be appalled. When our representatives are not given the opportunity to thoroughly review government initiatives, we can be sure that no good will come of it.

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more