Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: How are parliamentarians supposed to digest, debate and deal with the massive pottage of bills unrelated to the budget? AND ... it’s troubling our government appears to be committed to doing everything proposed by the UN


The Government’s Omnibus Bill, C-97 - Budget Implementation Act, 2019, #1 contains a National Housing Strategy Act which states:
  • Whereas a national housing strategy would contribute to meeting the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations;
  • And whereas a national housing strategy would support the progressive realization of the right to adequate housing as recognized in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, to which Canada is a party;


The legislation sets lofty goals to improve the available housing in Canada but is silent on who will pay for reaching those goals. The federal government makes no commitment to fund its UN driven ideals. 

In addition, provinces have jurisdiction over:
  • The Management and Sale of the Public Lands belonging to the Province and of the Timber and Wood thereon; and
  • Generally, all Matters of a merely local or private Nature in the Province.

The federal government does not have the constitutional power to regulate provincial housing.   

Bill C-97 also contains the Poverty Reduction Act which states:
  • Whereas Canada aspires to be a world leader in the eradication of poverty;
  • And whereas the progress made by Canada in the reduction of poverty contributes to meeting the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations;

The legislation sets out lofty goals:
6 The targets for poverty reduction in Canada to which the Government of Canada aspires are the following:
(a) 20% below the level of poverty in 2015 by 2020; and
(b) 50% below the level of poverty in 2015 by 2030.

Once again, there is nothing tangible as to how those goals are to be underwritten (paid for) or how they are to be achieved. Targets the government aspires to are opaque and meaningless. Aspiring to something is not a commitment to action, but the outline of a dream.

It is troubling that our government appears to be committed to doing everything proposed by the United Nations. If so, dissolve parliament and save us the costs of a useless institution that cannot reason or think for itself or act in the best interests of Canadians.

BILL C-97 ALSO HAS 9 pages of summary, 12 pages of provisions and 367 pages of text dealing with:


  1. the Income Tax Act,
  2. GST/HST Measures,
  3. Strengthening Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorist Financing Regime,
  4. Employment Equity Act,
  5. Canada Pension Plan,
  6. Old Age Security Act,
  7. Regulatory Modernization,
  8. Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act,
  9. Pilotage Act,
  10. An Act respecting the commercialization of security screening services,
  11. Aviation Industry Indemnity Act,
  12. Transportation Appeal Tribunal of Canada Act,
  13. An Act respecting the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants,
  14. Immigration and Refugee Protection Act,
  15. Federal Courts Act,
  16. National Housing Act,
  17. An Act respecting the reduction of poverty,
  18. Veterans Well-being Act,
  19. Student Loans,
  20. Canada National Parks Act,
  21. Parks Canada Agency Act,
  22. An Act respecting the Department of Indigenous Services,
  23. An Act respecting the Department of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Act, and finally,
  24. An Act to establish a regime for prompt payment for construction work performed for the purposes of a construction project in respect of federal real property or federal immovables.

How are parliamentarians supposed to digest, debate and deal with the massive pottage of bills unrelated to the budget?

It is an attempt to circumvent the standing committees of the Commons who would be dissecting the various Bills included in an orderly fashion.

We should be appalled. When our representatives are not given the opportunity to thoroughly review government initiatives, we can be sure that no good will come of it.

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

GORDON F. D. WILSON: When The Trick Masquerades as The Treat

Thirty-seven years ago, Halloween 1987, I became the leader of the BC Liberal Party.   British Columbia was badly polarized. Social Credit held one side and the NDP the other. It had been twelve years, 1975, since Liberal MLAs Garde Gardom, Pat McGeer, and Alan Williams had walked away from their party to join Social Credit, one year after the lone Progressive Conservative MLA Hugh Curtis had abandoned his party to sit with Bill Bennett, the son and heir apparent to long-serving BC Premier, WAC Bennett.   An unwritten agreement by the biggest Canadian political shareholders, the federal Liberals and Conservatives, decided that if British Columbia was to remain a lucrative franchise from a revenue perspective, they couldn’t risk splitting the electoral vote and electing the real enemy, the NDP, so no resources would be used to finance either a Liberal or Conservative party provincially.   “There are two sides to every street,” I was told by a very prominent Canadian businessman who cont

FORSETH: As a BC Conservative member, and campaign worker, I will again state that the fact these errors were found -- AND brought to light BY Elections BC -- shows the system IS working

Sadly, two and a half weeks after the BC provincial election campaign, those who want to undermine our political process are still at.  PLUS, we also have one who doesn’t even live in our country, never mind our province. I speak of the buffoon running for President of the United States, who has poisoned the well when it comes to faith in the electoral process. Just today alone, comments such as the following, were being made of posts that I shared online: ... all the votes they keep finding has just favoured NDP on in all critical ridings and soon they will flip another riding in favour of NDP, Come on. ... Elections BC has ridiculed British Columbians, and I no longer have confidence or trust in their process and competence regarding the results Then there are others online, with comments like these – who are claiming fraud in the October 19th election: ... Who is the oversight for Elections BC? They should be investigated for election fraud! ... Fraudulent election ... should be red

“With the talent and dedication of this caucus we will hold David Eby to account for his government’s out of control spending and ongoing failures in healthcare, public safety and addictions" — John Rustad

Today, John Rustad, Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia, proudly unveiled his shadow cabinet, a dynamic team of talented individuals ready to hold David Eby’s disastrous government accountable and present a strong alternative vision for British Columbia. “ Our shadow cabinet is a diverse and experienced group, committed to restoring prosperity, public safety, and affordability for every British Columbian ,” said Rustad. “ With experts in every field, we are focused on delivering real solutions for the challenges our province faces .” Rustad emphasized the historic appointment of Aaliya Warbus as House Leader. The shadow cabinet reflects the Conservative Party’s vision to build a brighter future for British Columbia. The appointments are as follows: Leadership Positions : Aaliya Warbus – House Leader Bruce Banman – Whip Sheldon Claire – Deputy Whip Portfolios : Tony Luck – Municipal Affairs and Local Government Sharon Hartwell – Rural Communities and Rural Development I

Labels

Show more