Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Is it a permission slip? Is it an obligatory tip of the hat? A minor detour? Has it changed anything?


Alan Forseth, Kamloops ~~ April 13th, 2019

I want to take a moment here and now to thank Green Party MLA Adam Olsen for offering, and providing, a fresh way to look at things.  I know what I first added him to the contributors to the blogsite, and number of my conservative friends thought I was off my rocker.  Truth to tell, I though maybe I was as well  😊

That said, and as I occasionally point out, the sub-heading of the blog header states ... “A discussion on political, economic and social issues in British Columbia, and Canada

Green Party MLA Adam Olsen
Saanich North and Islands
Mr. Olsen helps to be a part in ensuring that happens; which was why an opinion piece he penned two days ago (April 11th) caught my attention.  In the post he observed:

There is a growing movement of acknowledging the territory of Indigenous people. It has become a familiar opening to meetings and events run by government.

It is an important evolution in Canadian society. But we must continue to challenge the status quo and demand better. It is critical that we know why we do these things and the impact they have.

To be 100% honest, I have more and more, in recent times, be annoyed at hearing a few different variations of, “We wish to acknowledge we are here on the territory of the __ insert name of the First Nation __ people”

It has gotten to the point where in my head I say to myself .... here we go again.

That’s why I appreciate Adams quantifying things by saying ...  It is critical that we know why we do these things and the impact they have.

So, am I annoyed that we are acknowledging where we are?  The answer to that is an emphatic “NO”!

What I am now able to understand, after reading Adam’s words, is that the words really have no meaning if we choose to say the same thing over and over ... no attempt to make it personal to the occasion ... and that it’s simply a box we check off as being done before we move on to whatever the event is.

And bingo ... the MLA for Saanich North and the Islands hit the nail on the head for me:

Acknowledging Indigenous people and territory is an important step forward in our society. But what does it mean? Is it a permission slip? Is it an obligatory tip of the hat, a minor detour just before we get back to the colonial business as usual? Has it changed anything?”


He then continued, “Well, it's an admission that our province and our country stand on a questionable foundation and that we are on a path to recovery. But what is the effect of mindlessly reciting a script? Does that undermine and erode the meaning of the words?”

If it is just mindlessly reciting a script, then yes indeed (at least in my opinion) it does undermine and erode the meaning of the words.

Adam states that he is a ... a community leader with a foot in two worlds ... and that ... people often ask my advice on territorial acknowledgements.

I encourage them to speak from the heart, to reflect on the beautiful place and the powerful cultures that have endured the most challenging circumstances”, he tells them.

I ask them to give themselves permission to stumble and make mistakes, to honour our past, and embrace positive, compassionate relationships with Indigenous people and communities.”

We should honour our past ... no matter what our ethnicity ... and we should also have a true and meaningful acknowledgement of the indigenous people wherever we live in the province of BC.

As Olsen states, “It is critical that we know why we do these things and the impact they have”.

So rather than a simple ... we acknowledge this event is happening on the territory of the _______ people ... let’s know why we are saying it, and let it be sincere and meaningful.

In concluding I would like to encourage you to read the full blog post from Adam Olsen which is entitled, “Acknowledging territory, words and actions”.

Comments

  1. Well said, Alan. Doing the right thing can sometimes be a difficult path to discern. But it starts with the heart and reason follows. Glad to see Adam on board. Good ideas come from all perspectives.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more