Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Is it a permission slip? Is it an obligatory tip of the hat? A minor detour? Has it changed anything?


Alan Forseth, Kamloops ~~ April 13th, 2019

I want to take a moment here and now to thank Green Party MLA Adam Olsen for offering, and providing, a fresh way to look at things.  I know what I first added him to the contributors to the blogsite, and number of my conservative friends thought I was off my rocker.  Truth to tell, I though maybe I was as well  😊

That said, and as I occasionally point out, the sub-heading of the blog header states ... “A discussion on political, economic and social issues in British Columbia, and Canada

Green Party MLA Adam Olsen
Saanich North and Islands
Mr. Olsen helps to be a part in ensuring that happens; which was why an opinion piece he penned two days ago (April 11th) caught my attention.  In the post he observed:

There is a growing movement of acknowledging the territory of Indigenous people. It has become a familiar opening to meetings and events run by government.

It is an important evolution in Canadian society. But we must continue to challenge the status quo and demand better. It is critical that we know why we do these things and the impact they have.

To be 100% honest, I have more and more, in recent times, be annoyed at hearing a few different variations of, “We wish to acknowledge we are here on the territory of the __ insert name of the First Nation __ people”

It has gotten to the point where in my head I say to myself .... here we go again.

That’s why I appreciate Adams quantifying things by saying ...  It is critical that we know why we do these things and the impact they have.

So, am I annoyed that we are acknowledging where we are?  The answer to that is an emphatic “NO”!

What I am now able to understand, after reading Adam’s words, is that the words really have no meaning if we choose to say the same thing over and over ... no attempt to make it personal to the occasion ... and that it’s simply a box we check off as being done before we move on to whatever the event is.

And bingo ... the MLA for Saanich North and the Islands hit the nail on the head for me:

Acknowledging Indigenous people and territory is an important step forward in our society. But what does it mean? Is it a permission slip? Is it an obligatory tip of the hat, a minor detour just before we get back to the colonial business as usual? Has it changed anything?”


He then continued, “Well, it's an admission that our province and our country stand on a questionable foundation and that we are on a path to recovery. But what is the effect of mindlessly reciting a script? Does that undermine and erode the meaning of the words?”

If it is just mindlessly reciting a script, then yes indeed (at least in my opinion) it does undermine and erode the meaning of the words.

Adam states that he is a ... a community leader with a foot in two worlds ... and that ... people often ask my advice on territorial acknowledgements.

I encourage them to speak from the heart, to reflect on the beautiful place and the powerful cultures that have endured the most challenging circumstances”, he tells them.

I ask them to give themselves permission to stumble and make mistakes, to honour our past, and embrace positive, compassionate relationships with Indigenous people and communities.”

We should honour our past ... no matter what our ethnicity ... and we should also have a true and meaningful acknowledgement of the indigenous people wherever we live in the province of BC.

As Olsen states, “It is critical that we know why we do these things and the impact they have”.

So rather than a simple ... we acknowledge this event is happening on the territory of the _______ people ... let’s know why we are saying it, and let it be sincere and meaningful.

In concluding I would like to encourage you to read the full blog post from Adam Olsen which is entitled, “Acknowledging territory, words and actions”.

Comments

  1. Well said, Alan. Doing the right thing can sometimes be a difficult path to discern. But it starts with the heart and reason follows. Glad to see Adam on board. Good ideas come from all perspectives.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

GORDON F. D. WILSON: When The Trick Masquerades as The Treat

Thirty-seven years ago, Halloween 1987, I became the leader of the BC Liberal Party.   British Columbia was badly polarized. Social Credit held one side and the NDP the other. It had been twelve years, 1975, since Liberal MLAs Garde Gardom, Pat McGeer, and Alan Williams had walked away from their party to join Social Credit, one year after the lone Progressive Conservative MLA Hugh Curtis had abandoned his party to sit with Bill Bennett, the son and heir apparent to long-serving BC Premier, WAC Bennett.   An unwritten agreement by the biggest Canadian political shareholders, the federal Liberals and Conservatives, decided that if British Columbia was to remain a lucrative franchise from a revenue perspective, they couldn’t risk splitting the electoral vote and electing the real enemy, the NDP, so no resources would be used to finance either a Liberal or Conservative party provincially.   “There are two sides to every street,” I was told by a very prominent Canadian businessman who cont

FORSETH: As a BC Conservative member, and campaign worker, I will again state that the fact these errors were found -- AND brought to light BY Elections BC -- shows the system IS working

Sadly, two and a half weeks after the BC provincial election campaign, those who want to undermine our political process are still at.  PLUS, we also have one who doesn’t even live in our country, never mind our province. I speak of the buffoon running for President of the United States, who has poisoned the well when it comes to faith in the electoral process. Just today alone, comments such as the following, were being made of posts that I shared online: ... all the votes they keep finding has just favoured NDP on in all critical ridings and soon they will flip another riding in favour of NDP, Come on. ... Elections BC has ridiculed British Columbians, and I no longer have confidence or trust in their process and competence regarding the results Then there are others online, with comments like these – who are claiming fraud in the October 19th election: ... Who is the oversight for Elections BC? They should be investigated for election fraud! ... Fraudulent election ... should be red

“With the talent and dedication of this caucus we will hold David Eby to account for his government’s out of control spending and ongoing failures in healthcare, public safety and addictions" — John Rustad

Today, John Rustad, Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia, proudly unveiled his shadow cabinet, a dynamic team of talented individuals ready to hold David Eby’s disastrous government accountable and present a strong alternative vision for British Columbia. “ Our shadow cabinet is a diverse and experienced group, committed to restoring prosperity, public safety, and affordability for every British Columbian ,” said Rustad. “ With experts in every field, we are focused on delivering real solutions for the challenges our province faces .” Rustad emphasized the historic appointment of Aaliya Warbus as House Leader. The shadow cabinet reflects the Conservative Party’s vision to build a brighter future for British Columbia. The appointments are as follows: Leadership Positions : Aaliya Warbus – House Leader Bruce Banman – Whip Sheldon Claire – Deputy Whip Portfolios : Tony Luck – Municipal Affairs and Local Government Sharon Hartwell – Rural Communities and Rural Development I

Labels

Show more