Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Is it a permission slip? Is it an obligatory tip of the hat? A minor detour? Has it changed anything?


Alan Forseth, Kamloops ~~ April 13th, 2019

I want to take a moment here and now to thank Green Party MLA Adam Olsen for offering, and providing, a fresh way to look at things.  I know what I first added him to the contributors to the blogsite, and number of my conservative friends thought I was off my rocker.  Truth to tell, I though maybe I was as well  😊

That said, and as I occasionally point out, the sub-heading of the blog header states ... “A discussion on political, economic and social issues in British Columbia, and Canada

Green Party MLA Adam Olsen
Saanich North and Islands
Mr. Olsen helps to be a part in ensuring that happens; which was why an opinion piece he penned two days ago (April 11th) caught my attention.  In the post he observed:

There is a growing movement of acknowledging the territory of Indigenous people. It has become a familiar opening to meetings and events run by government.

It is an important evolution in Canadian society. But we must continue to challenge the status quo and demand better. It is critical that we know why we do these things and the impact they have.

To be 100% honest, I have more and more, in recent times, be annoyed at hearing a few different variations of, “We wish to acknowledge we are here on the territory of the __ insert name of the First Nation __ people”

It has gotten to the point where in my head I say to myself .... here we go again.

That’s why I appreciate Adams quantifying things by saying ...  It is critical that we know why we do these things and the impact they have.

So, am I annoyed that we are acknowledging where we are?  The answer to that is an emphatic “NO”!

What I am now able to understand, after reading Adam’s words, is that the words really have no meaning if we choose to say the same thing over and over ... no attempt to make it personal to the occasion ... and that it’s simply a box we check off as being done before we move on to whatever the event is.

And bingo ... the MLA for Saanich North and the Islands hit the nail on the head for me:

Acknowledging Indigenous people and territory is an important step forward in our society. But what does it mean? Is it a permission slip? Is it an obligatory tip of the hat, a minor detour just before we get back to the colonial business as usual? Has it changed anything?”


He then continued, “Well, it's an admission that our province and our country stand on a questionable foundation and that we are on a path to recovery. But what is the effect of mindlessly reciting a script? Does that undermine and erode the meaning of the words?”

If it is just mindlessly reciting a script, then yes indeed (at least in my opinion) it does undermine and erode the meaning of the words.

Adam states that he is a ... a community leader with a foot in two worlds ... and that ... people often ask my advice on territorial acknowledgements.

I encourage them to speak from the heart, to reflect on the beautiful place and the powerful cultures that have endured the most challenging circumstances”, he tells them.

I ask them to give themselves permission to stumble and make mistakes, to honour our past, and embrace positive, compassionate relationships with Indigenous people and communities.”

We should honour our past ... no matter what our ethnicity ... and we should also have a true and meaningful acknowledgement of the indigenous people wherever we live in the province of BC.

As Olsen states, “It is critical that we know why we do these things and the impact they have”.

So rather than a simple ... we acknowledge this event is happening on the territory of the _______ people ... let’s know why we are saying it, and let it be sincere and meaningful.

In concluding I would like to encourage you to read the full blog post from Adam Olsen which is entitled, “Acknowledging territory, words and actions”.

Comments

  1. Well said, Alan. Doing the right thing can sometimes be a difficult path to discern. But it starts with the heart and reason follows. Glad to see Adam on board. Good ideas come from all perspectives.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more