Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FRASER INSTITUTE Canada has not recently tried to simplify the tax system and has demonstrated little concerted effort at regulatory reduction or simplification


Tax complexity matters to all Canadians, mostly owing to the considerable resources and time that families and businesses spend on compliance.

Many of us incur substantial costs: time invested and money spent on professional legal and accounting services, and on tax preparers and tax software. Further, the Canadian tax system is recognized as being complex, hard to understand, and in urgent need of reform.

This study uses three broad categories of indicators to measure tax complexity: tax expenditures, tax legislation, and tax guides. Each indicator empirically measures a different aspect of tax complexity, and all three indicate that Canada’s tax system has become increasingly complex since 1996.

The number of federal personal income tax (PIT) tax expenditures increased from 111 to 146 (32 percent) from 1996 to 2016.

The number of federal corporate income tax (CIT) tax expenditures increased from 66 to 76 (15 percent)

And … the number of federal goods and services tax (GST) expenditures increased too, but to a lesser degree (9 percent).

The dollar value of federal tax expenditures has also markedly increased over the same period. PIT tax expenditures have grown by 55 percent, adjusted for inflation, while corporate income tax expenditures and GST tax expenditures grew by 51 percent and 48 percent respectively.

Tax legislation has steadily grown in size and volume.

Between 1990 and 2018, the text area occupied by the Income Tax Act and regulations increased 72 percent, from 974,050 cm² to 1,673,802 cm². While the number of pages increased by only 2 percent, page size increased by 69 percent over the same period.

Our third indicator of tax complexity is the length of the instructions required to complete a basic personal return. From 2001 to 2016, the length of the federal personal income tax guide for Ontario increased from 48 to 78 pages, for 63 percent growth over the 15-year time-frame.

Perhaps the biggest impact on perceived complexity and compliance costs in the past few decades is the popularity of personal and business tax form completion tools, coupled with the software’s subsequent internet enablement, now allowing most Canadians to complete all filing steps electronically. This is a profound change, and paper is now disappearing as a major tax filing mechanism.


As paper filings have shrunk, the number and share of tax returns submitted through Efile and Netfile mechanisms have grown substantially. Efile, the fastest growing mechanism, allows authorized tax preparers to electronically file returns, while Netfile enables taxpayers to file their own returns using readily available internet-enabled tax software.

Canadian taxpayers have also had access to an “Auto-fill” option since 2015.

This enables tax filers to download information from their income tax slips after obtaining data access through the Canada Revenue Agency. The use of Auto-fill went up sharply between the 2015 and 2016 tax years (468 percent), and increased again for the 2017 tax year. Usage is above 18 percent for all age groups over 20, tends to rise with income, and varies among the provinces.

While the introduction and growth in Auto-fill, Netfile, and Efile mechanisms may be productive in reducing the time and cost of compliance, these changes do not address the underlying complexity of the tax system, nor necessarily help taxpayers understand the tax system.

The risks are that Canadians may not be fully aware of their tax obligations, or understand how to make better choices to reduce their liabilities, and they may become complacent.


What is clear is that our indicators suggest an increase in federal tax complexity since the turn of the century: the number of credits, deductions, exemptions, exclusions, and other preferences, the text length of tax legislation, and the size of the federal personal income tax guide all increased by double-digit percentages.

Federal tax complexity is clearly increasing in Canada over time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more