Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN: Just as the Heads of the Houses who have fought alongside House Stark for eternity, are splitting hairs about Jon's decision to give up his Crown, we are also bickering about the sides of our House



This tweet from Torrance Coste, campaigner for the Wilderness Committee, caught my attention:

Centrism can’t beat the right anymore. We learned that down south in 2016, and in #Alberta tonight. Do we have to get this wrong again in the fall? Neoliberalism is done — we need a bold left alternative, or we’ll get right-wing populism

Jon Snow ~~ Game of Thrones
It was a response to the Alberta election but it reminded me of another significant event from just a few days earlier, the first episode of the final season of Game of Thrones.

How are this tweet, the Alberta election and the hit show connected? Good question! As I see it, the epic battle that has been brewing in the show for the past seven seasons is a metaphor of the challenge we face with global warming.

The show is a rather brutal, gory study in power dynamics. As a massive, seemingly invincible army of the dead is marching south, the Lords, Ladies, Queens and Kings of the seven kingdoms are fighting over who owns the Iron Throne, even if they would own it just for the final minutes before their inevitable destruction.

Jon Snow has seen what is coming. He realizes that their only hope is to overcome the bitter battles that have divided the seven kingdoms for a thousand years. So, he is frantically working to collect a response that is as robust as the problem they face. His response includes giving up his own Crown, and the power vested in it by all the Houses in the North, to someone else.


Power struggle

I have a front row seat at the provincial table and I have some insight into these power dynamics. I cannot help but draw the comparisons to our current situation. Just as the Heads of the Houses who have fought alongside House Stark for eternity are splitting hairs about Jon's decision to give up his Crown, we are also bickering about the sides of our House.

That is what caught my attention in Torrance's tweet. It is not a call to come together in a collective effort to tackle the defining crisis of our time.

Instead, it is a hardening of the deep divisions that are nothing more than absurd human constructs that allow us to take hold of power over each other, even for the final seconds before our own demise.

Check out the ridiculous battles on twitter each day between the members of the government and opposition. Apparently, it actually matters little who is sitting on what side of the debate.

Indeed, the famous motto of House Stark, "winter is coming", is an ominous prophecy for our time.

We have an opportunity to address collapsing ecosystems and species extinction, the devastating impact of a changing climate. But, if we insist on arguing about who wears the crown and who has the right to sit on the throne, then our House will remain divided, vulnerable and we will fall.

Jon Snow figured it out. Will we? I sure hope so, otherwise this whole game of thrones we have constructed is utterly meaningless.



Adam Olsen ... is a Green Party Member of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia for Saanich North and the Islands. Born in Victoria, BC in 1976, Adam has lived, worked and played his entire life on the Saanich Peninsula. He is a member of Tsartlip First Nation (W̱JOȽEȽP), where he and his wife, Emily, are raising their two children, Silas and Ella.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more