Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN: Just as the Heads of the Houses who have fought alongside House Stark for eternity, are splitting hairs about Jon's decision to give up his Crown, we are also bickering about the sides of our House



This tweet from Torrance Coste, campaigner for the Wilderness Committee, caught my attention:

Centrism can’t beat the right anymore. We learned that down south in 2016, and in #Alberta tonight. Do we have to get this wrong again in the fall? Neoliberalism is done — we need a bold left alternative, or we’ll get right-wing populism

Jon Snow ~~ Game of Thrones
It was a response to the Alberta election but it reminded me of another significant event from just a few days earlier, the first episode of the final season of Game of Thrones.

How are this tweet, the Alberta election and the hit show connected? Good question! As I see it, the epic battle that has been brewing in the show for the past seven seasons is a metaphor of the challenge we face with global warming.

The show is a rather brutal, gory study in power dynamics. As a massive, seemingly invincible army of the dead is marching south, the Lords, Ladies, Queens and Kings of the seven kingdoms are fighting over who owns the Iron Throne, even if they would own it just for the final minutes before their inevitable destruction.

Jon Snow has seen what is coming. He realizes that their only hope is to overcome the bitter battles that have divided the seven kingdoms for a thousand years. So, he is frantically working to collect a response that is as robust as the problem they face. His response includes giving up his own Crown, and the power vested in it by all the Houses in the North, to someone else.


Power struggle

I have a front row seat at the provincial table and I have some insight into these power dynamics. I cannot help but draw the comparisons to our current situation. Just as the Heads of the Houses who have fought alongside House Stark for eternity are splitting hairs about Jon's decision to give up his Crown, we are also bickering about the sides of our House.

That is what caught my attention in Torrance's tweet. It is not a call to come together in a collective effort to tackle the defining crisis of our time.

Instead, it is a hardening of the deep divisions that are nothing more than absurd human constructs that allow us to take hold of power over each other, even for the final seconds before our own demise.

Check out the ridiculous battles on twitter each day between the members of the government and opposition. Apparently, it actually matters little who is sitting on what side of the debate.

Indeed, the famous motto of House Stark, "winter is coming", is an ominous prophecy for our time.

We have an opportunity to address collapsing ecosystems and species extinction, the devastating impact of a changing climate. But, if we insist on arguing about who wears the crown and who has the right to sit on the throne, then our House will remain divided, vulnerable and we will fall.

Jon Snow figured it out. Will we? I sure hope so, otherwise this whole game of thrones we have constructed is utterly meaningless.



Adam Olsen ... is a Green Party Member of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia for Saanich North and the Islands. Born in Victoria, BC in 1976, Adam has lived, worked and played his entire life on the Saanich Peninsula. He is a member of Tsartlip First Nation (W̱JOȽEȽP), where he and his wife, Emily, are raising their two children, Silas and Ella.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more