Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: The problem as we witness every day is that regional, and personal equality, is thrown under the election bus

Sixty-one electoral districts?

City of Vancouver
The most fiercely contested territory in the October Election will be in 61 federal electoral districts. These will be the 18 in Montreal ... 25 in Toronto ... and 128 in Vancouver.

These sixty-one electoral districts make up 18% of the seats in the House of Commons, but are vital to any political party seeking a majority government.

Quebec has 8 cities outside Montreal which add another 30 electoral districts.
... 48 of 78 Quebec electoral district, or 61.5%, are urban.

Ontario has 16 cities outside Toronto which add another 67 electoral districts.
...92 of 121 Ontario electoral districts, or 55.4%, are urban.

British Columbia has 4 cities outside Vancouver which add another 10 electoral districts.
... 28 of 42 British Columbia electoral districts, or 66.7%, are urban

Toronto with CN Tower in foreground
The urban ridings in Ontario, Quebec and British Columbia account for just over half (50.1%) of the seats in the Commons.  Which is why every political party will throw major resources, manpower, (cash if you are in government) and promises of more cash into those urban electoral districts to secure seats -- and a majority government.

The problem, as we witness every day, is that regional and personal equality is thrown under the election bus. Political parties will be driven to favour vote rich areas rather than treat all provinces, cities, towns and people equally and fairly.

One solution to the problem is to convert our three major metropolitan areas, Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver into separate provinces with full provincial rights.

It sounds a bit strange, until we consider the effect on the amending formula in our constitution:
Montreal City

  • 7 of 10 provinces becomes 9 of 13 provinces representing 50% of the population, with many more possible combinations than we have at present.

  • the equalization formula would have to be changed, modernized and updated to accommodate 13 provinces; and

  • more per capita federal funding for education, health care and welfare would flow to other provinces and smaller centres.  

There is some food for thought.  


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more