Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN: Why do politicians act on consequences, instead of conscience? Because, they are rewarded for it


I heard a quote the other day; "They act out of fear of consequence, not out of conscience - Why? because you reward them for it!"  CNN anchor and Sirius XM host Chris Cuomo was talking about politicians.

Cuomo is brash. This quote comes from the middle of a rant about the political divide in the United States. It was actually very good, perhaps it was more of a verbose lamentation. Nevertheless, at a high level this is applicable in our divided politics.
LNG Canada

The wrong incentives motivate us.

In the debate on the LNG tax bill last week, more of that was exposed. Even though the votes on the record for these tax breaks show every BC NDP and every BC Liberal standing for them — and only the 3 Greens against — this does not accurately reflect the sentiment in the Chamber.

I can see it, and I have been told otherwise. While I deeply respect the challenge that each of my colleagues struggle with - personally, professionally and politically, I wonder why do they stand with such confidence when Mr. Speaker calls the vote?

Rewards for bad decisions

One explanation is the perverse incentives in our political systems. To Cuomo's point: for decades now, politicians have been acting out of fear of consequences, not on their conscience.

I had numerous conversations with my colleagues last week "who agree with much of what I am saying" in my speeches about the LNG tax bill. Yet, when the vote was called, there were only 3 of us standing to reflect that.


There are not strong enough consequences for knowingly disconnecting information. For example, how is it that there can be a majority of support for the LNG industry in British Columbia and an almost perfectly equal opposition to fracking?

It's because for many British Columbians the two are not directly connected. The LNG pitch based on a false premise that it is our duty to the rest of the world to help them get off coal, because burning gas is cleaner than burning coal.

But fracking is really bad for the environment. Concerns about water use, earthquakes, toxic tailings ponds pock-marking the landscape, habitat destruction and more are all realities of the fracking industry. They are our burdens and British Columbians are very concerned about that.

The whole supply chain

The LNG narrative has been, and continues to be, dishonest. An honest discussion would account for all aspects of the fracked gas supply chain, not just the convenient chunks.

An honest accounting of the economics does not stop at the revenue projections, but decision-makers would have to reflect on the projections of the environmental, social and other costs of the decision as well. Unfortunately, potential revenue is the only thing dangled in front of British Columbians.

My guess is that this decision about LNG and the future of our planet is being made by political operatives measuring consequences.

The BC Liberals will tell British Columbians:  
"This is our work; it was always this timeline; the BC NDP have done nothing (except make it worse). All this aside, we support it because we always have."

There are political consequences for them to vote against it.

The BC NDP on the other hand are calculating that if they can accomplish what the BC Liberals could not, then they will get a political win. If they can all weather the storm for a few weeks, while this bill is in front of the House, and keep their numbers in line (standing up when their supposed to), they might win some seats in non-traditional areas.

Adam Olsen, Green Party MLA
for Saanich North & the Islands
Finally, they are gambling that there will not be any consequences with their voting base. They’re betting their voters will look at the ballot, in the next election, and do what they have always done.

That's the final part of Cuomo's comment. Why do politicians act on consequences instead of conscience? Because, they are rewarded for it.



Adam Olsen is the Member of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia for Saanich North and the Islands

Born in Victoria, BC in 1976, Adam has lived, worked and played his entire life on the Saanich Peninsula. 

He is a member of Tsartlip First Nation (W̱JOȽEȽP), where he and his wife, Emily, are raising their two children, Silas and Ella.





FOR YOUR INFORMATION:

"BC government News:  Legislation introduced to complete fiscal framework for LNG investment, jobs and benefits"

Read full story by CLICKING HERE

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

“4.5 million hectares of forest lands have burned since 2023, and the best they can do is point to a 90-hectare block being salvaged?” ~~ Ward Stamer, Kamloops-North Thompson MLA

Today, BC NDP forest Minister Ravi Parmar made this pronouncement; ‘Removing red tape has sped up permitting, allowing for more wood to be salvaged, quicker’. 4.5 million hectares of forest lands have burned since 2023, and the best they can do is point to a 90-hectare block?    ~~ BC Conservative Forests Critic Ward Stamer While acknowledging the NDP government has recognized improvements were needed in permitting and accessing burnt fibre in a timely fashion, the reality is, they are barely making a dent in the problem.  This government's recognition that only seven percent of pulp mill fibre came from burnt timber in 2024-25, quite simply put, is a failure. And the recent announcement, just three weeks ago, that the Crofton Pulp Mill would be permanently closing, is proof of that.     Instead of Premier David Eby’s government addressing core issues being faced by British Columbia’s forest industry, they are doing little more than manipulating the facts, ...

A message from BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer, and the Kamloops – North Thompson Riding Association

2025 was a busy first year. As a Caucus, we worked very hard to defeat Bills 14 and 15, legislation which allows the provincial government to move ahead without environmental assessments on renewable projects, and that also allows cabinet to build infrastructure projects without getting approval from local municipal governments. This is not acceptable to your BC Conservative caucus, and we will continue to press this government for open and transparent projects in the future.  Two things we had success in were having the first Private Members bill passed in over 40 years. The first was Jody Toors Prenatal and Post Natal Care bill, and then there was my private members Bill M217 Mandatory Dashcams in commercial vehicles (passed second reading unanimously and is heading to Committee in February). Regrettably, much of the legislation passed by the government was little more than housekeeping bills, or opportunities to strengthen the ability of Cabinet Ministers to bypass the BC legi...

Wildfire waste plan torched -- Forestry critic Stamer calls BC's wildfire salvage rate 'a failure'

Claims that BC is making progress salvaging wildfire-damaged timber are masking deeper problems in the forest sector, the province’s forestry critic says. Last week, BC’s Ministry of Forests said mills in the province processed more than one million cubic metres of wildfire chips in 2024-25, up from 500,000 cubic metres in 2023 and representing about seven per cent of all processed wood. Kamloops-North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer said those claims of progress ignore the reality that only a fraction of burned timber is being used ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more