FELDSTED: Shooting the messenger -- some of the commentary respecting Jody Wilson-Raybould is needlessly vicious and mean spirited
Jody Wilson-Raybould
remained in caucus after being demoted – until Prime Minister Justin Trudeau
made the mistake of telling the media that her continued presence in Cabinet,
indicated she had not been under pressure from the PMO.
She resigned the following day.
Wilson-Raybould
made a credible presentation to the Commons Justice
Committee but avoided
revealing all of the evidence she had at hand. Her intent was not to destroy, however,
Wernick and Butts followed her presentation and intimated that she was
overreacting -- or misunderstood the communications.
Wilson-Raybould
retaliated with clear evidence of her original assertions, including a voice
recording of a conversation she had with . If Wernick and Butts
had not attempted a character assassination, the recording would probably not
ever have surfaced.
Rumours
that Wilson-Raybould wrote a 60-page missive to Trudeau asking that Winnipeg
Judge Joyal be appointed to the Supreme Court, not just as a judge, but as a
replacement for retiring Chief Justice Beverly McLaughlin are ridiculous and
worse, easily confirmed. Produce the missive or admit an attempt to smear
Wilson-Raybould.
The government can’t have it both ways.
It is
tiresome to listen to the government, media and academics telling us that
Michael Wernick, as Clerk of the Privy Council is non-partisan. In theory, yes,
but Wernick is also secretary of the Cabinet, sits in on all their meetings and
is as non-partisan as a sports team mascot.
Coverups are a particularly nasty business.
Government
efforts to control the narrative and change the dialogue to a different topic
have failed several times. Officials have been caught in lies and misdirection.
Buts resigned and Wernick announced his imminent retirement.
Wilson-Raybould
is not a reincarnation of Joan of Arc. She is a human with all of our frailties
and personal biases and a personal agenda. Her service as Attorney General and
Justice Minister is likely blemished but have to be considered apart from the
SNC-Lavalin pot-boiler.
Belated
concern has been raised that the positions of Attorney General and Justice
Minister should be separate due to potential conflicts. Wernick claims to have
been speaking to the Justice Minister, but only the Attorney General has to
power to intervene in the Lavalin prosecution.
The
same concern holds true for the Clerk of the Privy Council and Secretary to the
Cabinet. The potential for conflicts of interest in those roles is apparent and
we have seen the ugly results.
The
Privy Council is intended to report to, and support, the Governor General ...
not the Prime Minister.
That has to be fixed.
Confidentiality
of Privy Council operations has to be iron clad as communications between the
government and the must be leak-proof. The Privy Council is, by
law, informed of all government activates and the Governor General must be free
to encourage or warn government officials as he or she deems it necessary. The
Governor General has the right to be informed.
We
need a public inquiry into operations of the PMO; not only the SNC-Lavalin
scandal, but all of the questionable operations of federal governments. The
shotgun marriage of the Attorney General and Justice Minister is troubling.
They have distinct roles to play that are at times conflicting and that should
not happen. The Attorney General must not be a member of the Cabinet. He or she
cannot be without risking a conflict of interest.
Fix it.
The
dual roles of Privy Council Clerk and Secretary to the Cabinet are distinct
roles with very different roles that are incompatible and unconstitutional. The
Clerk of the Privy Council must be non-partisan and bound by absolute
confidentiality, reporting to and advising the Governor General. He is not the
most senior civil servant – that is the role of the Secretary to the Cabinet.
The
Secretary to the Cabinet is the most senior civil servant. He or she is the
bridge between the government and the civil service. The Secretary can communicate
with the Justice Minister, but not the Attorney General. The Attorney General
must be protected from political considerations in managing the justice system
without favour to or bias against anyone.
We
need a public inquiry, and recommendations, for the government of the day to
follow. No one party or government can oversee the needed changes. It has to be
an all-party agreement to work.
John
Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg,
Manitoba
Comments
Post a Comment