Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Shooting the messenger -- some of the commentary respecting Jody Wilson-Raybould is needlessly vicious and mean spirited



Jody Wilson-Raybould remained in caucus after being demoted – until Prime Minister Justin Trudeau made the mistake of telling the media that her continued presence in Cabinet, indicated she had not been under pressure from the PMO.

She resigned the following day.

Wilson-Raybould made a credible presentation to the Commons Justice
Committee but avoided revealing all of the evidence she had at hand. Her intent was not to destroy, however, Wernick and Butts followed her presentation and intimated that she was overreacting -- or misunderstood the communications.

Wilson-Raybould retaliated with clear evidence of her original assertions, including a voice recording of a conversation she had with . If Wernick and Butts had not attempted a character assassination, the recording would probably not ever have surfaced.

Rumours that Wilson-Raybould wrote a 60-page missive to Trudeau asking that Winnipeg Judge Joyal be appointed to the Supreme Court, not just as a judge, but as a replacement for retiring Chief Justice Beverly McLaughlin are ridiculous and worse, easily confirmed. Produce the missive or admit an attempt to smear Wilson-Raybould.

The government can’t have it both ways.

During the Justice Committee hearings, Michael Wernick announced that a directive written by Wilson-Raybould to justice staff on January 11th, 2019 was of concern. Wilson-Raybould was removed from the position of Attorney General and Justice Minister on January 14th, 2019 (3 days later) so any alleged concerns can be dealt with by her replacement. It is nothing set in stone or a change to existing law.  
   
It is tiresome to listen to the government, media and academics telling us that Michael Wernick, as Clerk of the Privy Council is non-partisan. In theory, yes, but Wernick is also secretary of the Cabinet, sits in on all their meetings and is as non-partisan as a sports team mascot.

Coverups are a particularly nasty business.

Government efforts to control the narrative and change the dialogue to a different topic have failed several times. Officials have been caught in lies and misdirection. Buts resigned and Wernick announced his imminent retirement.


Wilson-Raybould is not a reincarnation of Joan of Arc. She is a human with all of our frailties and personal biases and a personal agenda. Her service as Attorney General and Justice Minister is likely blemished but have to be considered apart from the SNC-Lavalin pot-boiler.

Belated concern has been raised that the positions of Attorney General and Justice Minister should be separate due to potential conflicts. Wernick claims to have been speaking to the Justice Minister, but only the Attorney General has to power to intervene in the Lavalin prosecution. 

The same concern holds true for the Clerk of the Privy Council and Secretary to the Cabinet. The potential for conflicts of interest in those roles is apparent and we have seen the ugly results.

The Privy Council is intended to report to, and support, the Governor General ... not the Prime Minister.

That has to be fixed.

Confidentiality of Privy Council operations has to be iron clad as communications between the government and the  must be leak-proof. The Privy Council is, by law, informed of all government activates and the Governor General must be free to encourage or warn government officials as he or she deems it necessary. The Governor General has the right to be informed.

We need a public inquiry into operations of the PMO; not only the SNC-Lavalin scandal, but all of the questionable operations of federal governments. The shotgun marriage of the Attorney General and Justice Minister is troubling. They have distinct roles to play that are at times conflicting and that should not happen. The Attorney General must not be a member of the Cabinet. He or she cannot be without risking a conflict of interest.

Fix it.

The dual roles of Privy Council Clerk and Secretary to the Cabinet are distinct roles with very different roles that are incompatible and unconstitutional. The Clerk of the Privy Council must be non-partisan and bound by absolute confidentiality, reporting to and advising the Governor General. He is not the most senior civil servant – that is the role of the Secretary to the Cabinet.

The Secretary to the Cabinet is the most senior civil servant. He or she is the bridge between the government and the civil service. The Secretary can communicate with the Justice Minister, but not the Attorney General. The Attorney General must be protected from political considerations in managing the justice system without favour to or bias against anyone.

We need a public inquiry, and recommendations, for the government of the day to follow. No one party or government can oversee the needed changes. It has to be an all-party agreement to work.


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

US Tribes Using DRIPA to Expand Influence in British Columbia

The BC Conservatives are sounding the alarm after receiving multiple filings in the BC Supreme Court in which U.S.-based Indigenous tribes are relying on DRIPA, UNDRIP, and the Interpretation Act to assert greater recognition of Aboriginal rights and direct involvement in British Columbia affairs. “This is a clear and growing sovereignty crisis,” said Scott McInnis, Critic for Indigenous Relations. “The Premier himself has referred to the DRIPA situation as an existential threat to British Columbia, and has said amendments are non‑negotiable. We are now seeing exactly why.” Court cases reveal that American tribes are attempting to leverage DRIPA to gain standing and influence inside BC. “It is becoming increasingly clear that DRIPA is being weaponized in ways never transparently disclosed to British Columbians,” McInnis said. “Allowing U.S. tribes to expand their reach into BC governance is deeply concerning and completely unacceptable.” One notable case, brought by a group of Alaskan ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Seniors Waiting Years for Care: New Data Exposes Growing Long-Term Care Crisis in BC

Image Credit: Seniors Advocate BC     “ Eight years. That is not a wait time. That is a system failur e” Seniors in British Columbia are now waiting years, not months, for access to long-term care, according to figures confirmed during Health Estimates this week. Brennan Day, MLA for Courtenay-Comox and Critic for Rural Health and Seniors’ Health, says the numbers paint a clear picture of a system falling behind the needs of a rapidly aging population. “Yesterday, after repeated questioning, the Minister finally confirmed that 7,829 seniors are currently waiting for long-term care in British Columbia,” said Day. “That’s an 11 percent increase in just one year.” The delays are not measured in weeks, they are measured in years. Across the province, average wait times now exceed a year in many regions. In Vancouver Coastal Health, the maximum wait time has reached 2,825 days, nearly eight years. “Eight years,” said Day. “That is not a wait time. That is a system failure.” At...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more