Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Shooting the messenger -- some of the commentary respecting Jody Wilson-Raybould is needlessly vicious and mean spirited



Jody Wilson-Raybould remained in caucus after being demoted – until Prime Minister Justin Trudeau made the mistake of telling the media that her continued presence in Cabinet, indicated she had not been under pressure from the PMO.

She resigned the following day.

Wilson-Raybould made a credible presentation to the Commons Justice
Committee but avoided revealing all of the evidence she had at hand. Her intent was not to destroy, however, Wernick and Butts followed her presentation and intimated that she was overreacting -- or misunderstood the communications.

Wilson-Raybould retaliated with clear evidence of her original assertions, including a voice recording of a conversation she had with . If Wernick and Butts had not attempted a character assassination, the recording would probably not ever have surfaced.

Rumours that Wilson-Raybould wrote a 60-page missive to Trudeau asking that Winnipeg Judge Joyal be appointed to the Supreme Court, not just as a judge, but as a replacement for retiring Chief Justice Beverly McLaughlin are ridiculous and worse, easily confirmed. Produce the missive or admit an attempt to smear Wilson-Raybould.

The government can’t have it both ways.

   
It is tiresome to listen to the government, media and academics telling us that Michael Wernick, as Clerk of the Privy Council is non-partisan. In theory, yes, but Wernick is also secretary of the Cabinet, sits in on all their meetings and is as non-partisan as a sports team mascot.

Coverups are a particularly nasty business.

Government efforts to control the narrative and change the dialogue to a different topic have failed several times. Officials have been caught in lies and misdirection. Buts resigned and Wernick announced his imminent retirement.


Wilson-Raybould is not a reincarnation of Joan of Arc. She is a human with all of our frailties and personal biases and a personal agenda. Her service as Attorney General and Justice Minister is likely blemished but have to be considered apart from the SNC-Lavalin pot-boiler.

Belated concern has been raised that the positions of Attorney General and Justice Minister should be separate due to potential conflicts. Wernick claims to have been speaking to the Justice Minister, but only the Attorney General has to power to intervene in the Lavalin prosecution. 

The same concern holds true for the Clerk of the Privy Council and Secretary to the Cabinet. The potential for conflicts of interest in those roles is apparent and we have seen the ugly results.

The Privy Council is intended to report to, and support, the Governor General ... not the Prime Minister.

That has to be fixed.

Confidentiality of Privy Council operations has to be iron clad as communications between the government and the  must be leak-proof. The Privy Council is, by law, informed of all government activates and the Governor General must be free to encourage or warn government officials as he or she deems it necessary. The Governor General has the right to be informed.

We need a public inquiry into operations of the PMO; not only the SNC-Lavalin scandal, but all of the questionable operations of federal governments. The shotgun marriage of the Attorney General and Justice Minister is troubling. They have distinct roles to play that are at times conflicting and that should not happen. The Attorney General must not be a member of the Cabinet. He or she cannot be without risking a conflict of interest.

Fix it.

The dual roles of Privy Council Clerk and Secretary to the Cabinet are distinct roles with very different roles that are incompatible and unconstitutional. The Clerk of the Privy Council must be non-partisan and bound by absolute confidentiality, reporting to and advising the Governor General. He is not the most senior civil servant – that is the role of the Secretary to the Cabinet.

The Secretary to the Cabinet is the most senior civil servant. He or she is the bridge between the government and the civil service. The Secretary can communicate with the Justice Minister, but not the Attorney General. The Attorney General must be protected from political considerations in managing the justice system without favour to or bias against anyone.

We need a public inquiry, and recommendations, for the government of the day to follow. No one party or government can oversee the needed changes. It has to be an all-party agreement to work.


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

GORDON F. D. WILSON: When The Trick Masquerades as The Treat

Thirty-seven years ago, Halloween 1987, I became the leader of the BC Liberal Party.   British Columbia was badly polarized. Social Credit held one side and the NDP the other. It had been twelve years, 1975, since Liberal MLAs Garde Gardom, Pat McGeer, and Alan Williams had walked away from their party to join Social Credit, one year after the lone Progressive Conservative MLA Hugh Curtis had abandoned his party to sit with Bill Bennett, the son and heir apparent to long-serving BC Premier, WAC Bennett.   An unwritten agreement by the biggest Canadian political shareholders, the federal Liberals and Conservatives, decided that if British Columbia was to remain a lucrative franchise from a revenue perspective, they couldn’t risk splitting the electoral vote and electing the real enemy, the NDP, so no resources would be used to finance either a Liberal or Conservative party provincially.   “There are two sides to every street,” I was told by a very prominent Canadian businessman who cont

FORSETH: You Have To Be A Bit Crazy

  Ward and his wife Carleen celebrating his win on election night.   In March of this year, I took on the role of Campaign Manager for BC Conservative candidate Ward Stamer.  It’s the third time I’ve had the opportunity as I took on the role for Peter Sharp in 2013, and for Dennis Giesbrecht in 2020. Now let me tell you, in the past, a BC Conservative campaign team generally consisted of myself, the candidate and one or two helpers – and very little in the way of a campaign budget. Thankfully, a benefit of having spent 30+ years in the broadcast media afforded me the ability to do ad copy and write candidate speeches, and prep both Dennis and Peter to deal with the media – it’s also something I have always enjoyed. That was part of my duties this time around as well, however having a team of a dozen and a half volunteers meant that for the first time we had people available to ID our supporters, put together and install campaign signs, distribute campaign literature, and help out at ou

Rustad will support policy for 'everyday' people, otherwise work to bring down NDP

  Conservative Party of B.C. John Rustad Tuesday (Oct. 29) said his party would support government policies that support "average, everyday working" persons in B.C., but also repeated earlier promises to bring down the B.C. NDP government under Premier David Eby. "If there are things that are moved forward that will improve lives for those people, we would be looking at support it," Rustad said. "But if he's going to carry forward with the destructive policies that he has, then yes, we are going to look at every opportunity possible to bring him down as soon as possible."  CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more