Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Uttering that hogwash with a straight face is incredible


SNC Lavalin has decided to challenge the independent prosecutor in federal court. That may sound audacious but that is where a deferred prosecution agreement will eventually go. Let me explain:

We have been given the false impression that all Jody Wilson-Raybould had to do was to agree to override the independent prosecutors and that would allow Lavalin a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA).

It is not that simple. 

If she did, the independent prosecutor is no longer independent; and ... she would be required by law to give notice of the decision in the Gazette and explain why she was overriding the independent prosecutor.

Even then it is not a ‘done deal’. Every DPA has to be referred to a federal judge for approval, which includes a review of whether or not the corporation being granted a DPA qualifies and if the terms are acceptable.

When asked about the Lavalin court action, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau responded by stating we have an independent court system and will await its findings. Uttering that hogwash with a straight face is incredible. Through his PMO minions, he:


  • rushed through a change to our criminal code in a finance bill to set up a framework for a DPA; 
  • pressured and threatened the Attorney General to override the prosecution branch; 
  • ignored the Attorney General’s warnings that he was on thin ice and a Lavalin DPA would blow up; 
  • removed the Attorney General for not caving in to his threats; 
  • stated that the possibility of a Lavalin DPR is still open; and 
  • through it all insists his office has done nothing wrong, as if accommodating intense Lavalin lobbying is just government business as usual.


Poppycock!

Writing Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) legislation into our criminal code to benefit one corporation is unusual, unorthodox and unjustifiable.

DPA legislation is intended to encourage corporations to come forward and admit criminal culpability in return for an agreement that can include paying fines, turning over assets and profits acquired unlawfully and avoiding future criminal activities for a stated period.

If the contract is kept, charges can be dropped. If the contract is broken, the original charges will proceed.

CLICK HERE for more information on Deferred Prosecution Agreements

Lavalin did not come forward and admit guilt as required for a DPA. It was caught by the authorities.

 
John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

GORDON F. D. WILSON: When The Trick Masquerades as The Treat

Thirty-seven years ago, Halloween 1987, I became the leader of the BC Liberal Party.   British Columbia was badly polarized. Social Credit held one side and the NDP the other. It had been twelve years, 1975, since Liberal MLAs Garde Gardom, Pat McGeer, and Alan Williams had walked away from their party to join Social Credit, one year after the lone Progressive Conservative MLA Hugh Curtis had abandoned his party to sit with Bill Bennett, the son and heir apparent to long-serving BC Premier, WAC Bennett.   An unwritten agreement by the biggest Canadian political shareholders, the federal Liberals and Conservatives, decided that if British Columbia was to remain a lucrative franchise from a revenue perspective, they couldn’t risk splitting the electoral vote and electing the real enemy, the NDP, so no resources would be used to finance either a Liberal or Conservative party provincially.   “There are two sides to every street,” I was told by a very prominent Canadian businessman who cont
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH: You Have To Be A Bit Crazy

  Ward and his wife Carleen celebrating his win on election night.   In March of this year, I took on the role of Campaign Manager for BC Conservative candidate Ward Stamer.  It’s the third time I’ve had the opportunity as I took on the role for Peter Sharp in 2013, and for Dennis Giesbrecht in 2020. Now let me tell you, in the past, a BC Conservative campaign team generally consisted of myself, the candidate and one or two helpers – and very little in the way of a campaign budget. Thankfully, a benefit of having spent 30+ years in the broadcast media afforded me the ability to do ad copy and write candidate speeches, and prep both Dennis and Peter to deal with the media – it’s also something I have always enjoyed. That was part of my duties this time around as well, however having a team of a dozen and a half volunteers meant that for the first time we had people available to ID our supporters, put together and install campaign signs, distribute campaign literature, and help out at ou
Post a Comment
Read more

Rustad will support policy for 'everyday' people, otherwise work to bring down NDP

  Conservative Party of B.C. John Rustad Tuesday (Oct. 29) said his party would support government policies that support "average, everyday working" persons in B.C., but also repeated earlier promises to bring down the B.C. NDP government under Premier David Eby. "If there are things that are moved forward that will improve lives for those people, we would be looking at support it," Rustad said. "But if he's going to carry forward with the destructive policies that he has, then yes, we are going to look at every opportunity possible to bring him down as soon as possible."  CLICK HERE for the full story
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more