Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

RICK PETERSON: Maybe it will take a ‘new nation’ in the West to get things done. It works well for Quebec, doesn’t it?


Last week, when I sat in the Senate Committee meeting in Calgary with Brad Schell, I began thinking about prairie fires.

As I listened, and as Brad and I spoke on Bill C-69 on behalf of Suits and Boots, I thought about the upcoming Alberta election being held tomorrow and how it just might prove to be the spark the sets off a prairie fire.


I could imagine the fire – a smoking wall of western Canadian frustration.  It would sweep from Manitoba through Saskatchewan and Alberta, across to British Columbia, sparing only the Lower Mainland and Vancouver Island.

Fantasy as it may be, that’s been the thought crossing my mind in the past few weeks as I’ve watched the Bill C-69 Committee hearings unfold.

There is a clear, palpable and strong undercurrent of deep discontent across the resource-producing sector of Western Canada. You know it – everyone at Suits and Boots does. It’s one of frustration, and increasingly, lost hope that things will ever change. It’s at those depths of despair that fuel movements that have a surprising velocity and mass once they are set off.

Our Suits and Boots team has seen this first hand since September, when we started our #KillBillC69 campaign. We have 3,700 supporters across Canada, as you know, with 80% of them in Western Canada.

You call us, email us, write us and phone us every day. And you provided 37 pages of letters to the Senate Committee on Energy, the Environment and Natural Resources studying Bill C-69.

These letters were poignant, heartbreaking and moving.

Our panel presentation at the Senate committee, including Young Women in Energy and Pembina Pipelines, received a strong round of applause from the Senators, and thanks from Alberta Senator Paula Simon, for bringing these truly personal stories to their attention.

They had no idea ... many of those in the Senate still don’t ... and a large number of them never will.

And that’s the problem.


People who don’t live in Western Canada, or who aren’t from here, have no idea of the hurting here. No idea of the anger out here. And no idea why we’re standing up so strongly against a bill that would continue to choke off investment in the West and make it worse.

If there is a change in government in Alberta tomorrow, we may see how difficult it will actually be for a Premier of a single province to bend Ottawa’s will, no matter who is Prime Minister. So, if this doesn’t move the needle, what can?

The answer to that for western Canada might be to look at Quebec. Maybe it will take a new “nation” in the West to get things done. It works well for Quebec, doesn’t it?

Wikpedia defines “nation” as “a stable community of people, formed on the basis of a common language, territory, history, ethnicity, or psychological make-up manifested in a common culture.” Sounds like western Canada – outside of the Lower Mainland and Vancouver Island – to me, doesn’t it?

The House of Commons, in 2006 under Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper, overwhelmingly passed a motion to recognize Quebec as a “nation” within a united Canada.

Why not the Prairies as a “nation”?

So maybe those of us who don’t necessarily want “out” of Canada – for now, at least – should start to work on the platform of a Prairie “nation” within Canada.

It would constitute about 30% of Canada’s population. It is young and growing. It is resource-rich. It attracts more investment capital into the region than any other area of the country. It funds most of the Rest of Canada.

So, let’s see what happens in Alberta tomorrow and beyond. Let’s see what happens to Bill C-69 and Bill C-48.

And let’s start looking closely at the reality of what a Prairie “nation” inside Canada could look like.  Let’s start seeing if there’s support for this idea. Let’s hear from you and others about how we can best take our energy and resources and people and put them to use in a constructive way.

Let’s call it our “Prairie Fire Campaign”. And let’s see if we have any support for this. We have nothing to lose – look where we are now – and everything to gain. And we just might set something off that helps us all.

After all, Prairie grass grows greener and stronger after a fire.


All the best,
Rick Peterson
Founder, Suits and Boots

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more