Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: We cannot continue a representative contract with a gigolo government that has been bought by and caters to its primary financial supporters


Dear Prime Minister Justin Trudeau:

You have betrayed us. Your affair with SNC Lavalin is incompatible with your vow to serve and protect the people of Canada. Our covenant is shattered.

We are, herewith, serving notice of our petition for divorce. We have ample grounds for a formal end to our relationship. You are a promiscuous cad dancing with whoever will pay you well. You are true to no one, lest of all to yourself.

Your efforts to hide your affair with Lavalin are in vain. You stepped over a line. We value our independent justice system free from political interference. You are unconcerned over having brought us the disease of political interference in justice; the roots of tyranny.

Your dalliance with the United Nations is unseemly. It is 25 years since the Rwandan genocide. Canada was there. Despite urgent pleas for intervention to prevent the carnage, the United Nations failed to respond and over 800,000 Tutsi Rwandans were murdered. That is when the United Nations earned the title of Useless Nations.

Your efforts to write the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples into Canadian law is an abdication of your responsibility to Canadians. Reconciliation is an effort to mediate a system of laws and jurisdiction that is acceptable to all.

Canada voted against adoption of the UN declaration when it was introduced. The UN Declaration is not legally binding. Introducing this legislation will drive a wedge into reconciliation negotiations. We cannot have separate rights legislation for indigenous and non-indigenous people without destroying reconciliation.



Your blind adherence to combating climate change is irrational and unreasonable.

To quote your Environment minister: “With all projects, we take into account the emissions, and we make decisions based on science, evidence and facts, and when it comes to all projects, they also need to fit in with our climate plan—and they need to take into account those emissions.”

You have done nothing to verify science, evidence and facts presented to support climate change other than parrot the IPCC. Stuffing our approach to climate change into the IPCC framework is not evidence-based decision making. It is fraud.

Your environmental legislation is a disguise for blocking needed pipeline infrastructure and refineries needed to make Canada an independent petroleum producer and exporter. The damage to our economy, entrepreneur confidence and investment is enormous. Canada is no longer regarded as a good place in which to do business. Pandering to your elite donors entails a very high price for all residents.

We recognize your recent efforts to divert attention from your Lavalin affair as what they are – distractions:
  • Threatening to sue to Opposition leader Andrew Scheer for false statements;
  • Giving $ 10 million to $ billionaire Loblaws to improve refrigerators; and
  • Suggesting that all conservatives are latent alt-right racists.


We are not distracted. The Lavalin affair has exposed the greedy group of interrelated corporate interests who exercise control over government policy. The link between Lavalin and Trans Mountain is disconcerting. The primary lawyer for Lavalin has been dispatched to negotiate/bribe indigenous bands to allow construction of the Trans Mountain expansion. What is in that for Lavalin and your party?

We note that you remain true to form in extending equalization payments to provinces until 2024 in the Budget Implementation Act, 2018, No. 1 (Bill C-74). This obvious pandering to the Quebec Region at the expense of the other three regions of Canada and violation of the spirit of Constitution Section 36 is another substantive support for our petition for divorce.

We will not accept unilateral federal dictates. Provincial interests still matter.

We cannot continue a representative contract with a gigolo government that has been bought by and caters to its primary financial supporters.

Consider yourself served with notice. We deserve better.          

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more