Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Sorry but that trade-off of savings, for increased costs, won’t add up no matter how many years someone continues to live in an Energy Step Code Home


Alan Forseth ~~ Kamloops, BC ~~ April 16th, 2019

More local governments stepped up in March, to the BC Energy Step Code, according to the Vancouver Regional Construction Association (VRCA).

Just over 40 local governments have now notified the province that they are consulting with industry on a BC Energy Step Code strategy, with the most recent communities being Bowen Island ... the District of Lake Country ... and the Regional District of East Kootenay.  All of these communities submitted their paperwork last month (March 2019).

 
According to the VCRA they are just completing the finishing touches on a publicly accessible spreadsheet that will allow anyone to see, at a glance, which local governments have referenced the BC Energy Step Code their building bylaws, plan to do so, and how.

Here in Kamloops, City Councillor Arjun Singh informed me that our community is, “... part of the 40+ communities list.”

Said Singh, “We notified the Energy Step code council of our work on the step code in July of 2018: 
https://energystepcode.ca/implementation_updates/

According to government sources the BC Energy Step Code is an optional compliance path in the BC Building Code that local governments may use, if they choose to do so, to incentivize or require a level of energy efficiency in new construction that goes above and beyond the requirements of the BC Building Code.

Currently builders may voluntarily use the BC Energy Step Code as a new compliance path for meeting the energy-efficiency requirements of the BC Building Code


Again, in speaking with Kamloops Councillor Arjun Singh he indicated that:
Council and staff are working with the home-building community, and with the community at large to engage them on the issues and opportunities here. We are still very much in an engagement phase”.

The benefits to the energy step code?  There are actually a number of them, beginning with health and comfort. High-performance homes are more comfortable and healthier, because they effectively manage temperature and fresh air throughout the building.

According to the BC government, the BC Energy Step Code will put our province on a path to meet the province’s target that all new buildings must be “net-zero energy ready” by 2032.  Additionally, we could see benefits to jobs and the economy, as the code could open up new opportunities for BC firms in the growing global market for energy efficiency education, technology, and services.

When I spoke with Rose Choy, Central Interior Executive Director of the Canadian Home Builders Association, she indicated that while it is not currently ‘implemented’ in the Kamloops area, builders are already building energy efficient homes, including this “Y” Dream Home.

Energy efficiency is a community wide issue, and it’s one that concerns all of us”, stated Choy who continued.

The Energy Step Code, as it currently exists, is impacting just new home stock, which accounts for just 1% of builds, and that stock is already built with high energy efficiency.”

Again, looking to comments from Councillor Singh, he remarked;

We started first hearing about the step code in early 2017, I believe. And through council's sustainability advisory committee last term, we started looking at how to implement it”.

“It is slated to be mandatory province wide to reach "step 3" by 2022, I believe, and then to "step 5" near passive house standard by 2032.” 

That could be a costly implementation however, one that many may question the return on investment that new homeowners are going to be expected to pick up.




Looking at my area of the city of Kamloops, a 4,000 square foot home, priced at $520,00, is definitely going to see its cost increase substantially.   

Taking it to Step One will add just over $16,000 in extra costs, and at Step 2 of the code, the added cost would be over $67,000.

As Councillor Singh stated, reaching Step 3 is expected by 2022, at which time the added cost will then be just over $93,000.

STEP NUMBER 5, to be attained by 2032 will add over $100,000 to that average family home in Kamloops.   

That, in my opinion is a financial cost that WILL NOT be covered through energy efficiency.  If they stay in that home for say 25 years, it will have cost them $4,000 during that period.

Still the BC government states that, “The BC Energy Step Code improves energy efficiency and lowers energy bills compared to homes and buildings with similar systems designed under the BC Building Code”.

Another thing they state is that the code gives builders a welcome level of consistency on energy efficiency between local governments.  That however seems more like an enforced program, with high additional costs, imposed only on new home builds. 

So, what then about older homes in every community across the province?  According to the BC Energy Step Code website, they state that:

“The standard is intended for new construction. Because the standard evaluates the building as a system, it is impractical to apply it to most renovations where existing portions of the building are not being upgraded”

But that said, the government has stated that the code provides flexibility to pursue innovative, creative, cost-effective solutions ... and allows them to incorporate leading-edge technologies as they come available.  Could these then not be implemented into renovation work as well then?

Now don’t get me wrong ... I don’t wish to see homeowners saddled with any unnecessary costs that would keep them out of owning their own home ... and after all, as the spokesperson for the Central Interior region of the Canadian Home Builders Association has already indicated, new home builders are currently building energy efficient projects.

New home builders are going to be at an extremely difficult position once Step 3 is reached, and a cost of $100,000 is being added to a new home build.  

I know if it was me, rather than a new build, I’d put that one-hundred-grand into renovating a home that’s only several years old instead. NO NEW BUILD FOR ME!

While the standard sets out a consistent path for future updates to the BC Building Code—giving builders a sense of what lies ahead on energy efficiency, what lies ahead could be disaster for some of the top home builders as all of a sudden new construction drops greatly due to added costs.

The benefits to us, as outlined by the BC government, of higher energy-efficiency standards include:

... improved comfort through better temperature management ... improved health through better managing fresh air ... reduced noise because of better insulation and air-tightness ... and lower their energy bills.


Owning a family home is already a faraway dream for many ... I believe this can only make it worse.



FOR MORE INFORMATION you can DOWNLOAD the Consumer Guide to High Performance Homes

You can also find the information on the Step Code on the website for the Canadian Home Builders Association – Central Interior at:  https://www.chbaci.ca/education_stepcode.htm

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nurses Take Job Action After Years of NDP Neglect

Image Credit:  BC Nurses Union BC nurses have reached a breaking point after years of unsafe conditions, rising violence in the workplace and a government that wouldn’t listen. Now they are on the picket line fighting to be heard. Last week, nurses began job action with a 72-hour strike notice, refusing non-essential overtime and stepping back from non-nursing duties. As of Tuesday, they have escalated to picket lines for the first time in decades. This moment was avoidable. It is the result of years of unanswered concerns from the frontline workers who keep our hospitals running. Nurses have been raising the same concerns for years: unsafe staffing levels, rising violence on the job, and a workload no single person should have to carry. None of it is new, and none of it should have taken a strike vote to get the government's attention. "Nurses are exercising their legal right to job action, but it shouldn’t have had to come to this," said Kiel Giddens, MLA for...

British Columbians Still Don’t Know Who’s Paying for NDP’s BC Hydro Deal

The NDP is making billion-dollar promises with BC Hydro, but British Columbians still don’t know who will pay the bill. Last week’s memorandum of understanding isn’t what the federal government and the NDP are making it out to be. It’s an admission that the NDP failed to make the long-term investments needed to keep B.C. powered. Now British Columbians have serious questions about the cost and whether BC Hydro ratepayers will end up paying the price. David L. Williams, MLA for Salmon Arm-Shuswap and Shadow Minister for BC Hydro and Electrical Energy Development , said British Columbians deserve clear answers about the full implications of the Canada–British Columbia Cooperative Prosperity Agreement. “British Columbians deserve the full truth,” said Mr. Williams. “This multi-billion-dollar announcement does not answer who pays for cost overruns, who pays for new generation, who carries the risk if industrial customers do not materialize, or whether ratepayers will be forced ...

NDP Government Blames Everyone but Themselves

The federal government has announced new measures to support British Columbia's forestry sector, including $65 million in funding for projects across the province. While any support is welcome, it falls far short of the level of assistance other provinces have secured for key industries. Conservative Forests Critic Ward Stamer says the NDP government needs to take responsibility for its mismanagement of B.C.’s forest industry instead of trying to pass on the blame. Despite promising to create more jobs in the forest sector, the NDP government has overseen the loss of thousands of forestry jobs and 21 mill closures which have devastated communities. “If Premier Eby spent more time addressing the regulatory issues impacting the forestry sector than he did complaining about the federal government, we would not be in the position we are now,” said Stamer. “And instead of trying to place the blame for mill closures on Donald Trump, Minister of Forests Ravi Parmar should t...

Labels

Show more