Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

RICK PETERSON: Senate committee will hear about families being torn apart, savings drained by lack of work, towns dissolving under the pressure of lost jobs, and politics driving decisions rather than science


Tomorrow (April 9th), members of Canada’s Senate will be hearing voices ... voices of pain from the Prairies.

The Senate’s standing committee on energy, the environment and natural resources will be in Calgary that day to hold hearings on Bill C-69. Suits and Boots has been asked to speak to the committee.

I’ll be there representing the Suits in our group, while honorary chair Brad Schell, a retired oilpatch hauler from High River, will be there on behalf of the Boots on the ground in Canada’s resource sector.

We will bring written testimony from about three dozen Canadians, mainly from the Prairies, who have written us about the pain they feel — caused by the current regulatory dysfunction and virtual shut down of new pipeline construction.

It was our 3,700 members’ grassroots work writing, phoning, and emailing senators that got us where we are, so we thought it appropriate their voices get presented to the Senate this month.  

Their voices will be heard, in both official languages, as these Suits and Boots supporters speak to the human cost of poor policy, how it devastates real families, communities and futures. They will speak to their fear that cost will go even higher, and the pain even deeper, if Bill C-69 passes as drafted.

They won’t go too deeply into policy suggestions but will speak about lost dreams and lost ambitions. The Senate committee will hear about families being torn apart, savings drained by lack of work, towns dissolving under the pressure of lost jobs, about highly trained professionals in the energy sector watching flawed social policy objectives and politics driving decisions rather than science and technical studies. 


Suits and Boots started a campaign to #KillBillC69 last September, shortly after the bill went to the Senate. Reading the bill, it was quickly apparent that rather than resolving issues and delays caused by the current rules for getting good, responsible resource projects approved it makes them worse.

Called the Impact Assessment Act, Bill C-69 introduced numerous new requirements proposed projects would have to meet during their review, many of them unrelated to the project itself, allows a cabinet minister to unilaterally cancel a project for political reasons even after years of expensive and time-consuming review, and opens up broad avenues for delaying lawsuits.

We all agree projects in Canada must live up to rigorous environmental and social standards. However, the process needs to give project proponents the certainty that if they come forward with a good project and consult properly, they will have a reasonable opportunity to get on with it. 

Why would a company invest billions of dollars into a project without any certainty it could proceed, when some politician can cancel their project at the 11th hour? They won’t. They’ll take their money somewhere else.

We hope the senators on this committee listen to Canadians’ voices.

The Senate has the power to kill C-69, send it back to the Liberal government for another try. The Senate has used this power to kill or turn back more than 200 bills since Confederation, including bills the House sent to it in the past few decades on major issues like abortion, free trade, GST and greenhouse gas regulation.

We are calling on them to again exercise their power of sober second thought, with the powerful, grassroots perspectives of our members in mind, and their voices in their heads.

We are asking them to hear the pain in the Prairies, and help make sure the hurting stops.

Rick Peterson is founder of Suits and Boots, a registered not-for-profit group of investment industry professionals and resource sectors workers and their families across Canada.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more