Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

RICK PETERSON: Senate committee will hear about families being torn apart, savings drained by lack of work, towns dissolving under the pressure of lost jobs, and politics driving decisions rather than science


Tomorrow (April 9th), members of Canada’s Senate will be hearing voices ... voices of pain from the Prairies.

The Senate’s standing committee on energy, the environment and natural resources will be in Calgary that day to hold hearings on Bill C-69. Suits and Boots has been asked to speak to the committee.

I’ll be there representing the Suits in our group, while honorary chair Brad Schell, a retired oilpatch hauler from High River, will be there on behalf of the Boots on the ground in Canada’s resource sector.

We will bring written testimony from about three dozen Canadians, mainly from the Prairies, who have written us about the pain they feel — caused by the current regulatory dysfunction and virtual shut down of new pipeline construction.

It was our 3,700 members’ grassroots work writing, phoning, and emailing senators that got us where we are, so we thought it appropriate their voices get presented to the Senate this month.  

Their voices will be heard, in both official languages, as these Suits and Boots supporters speak to the human cost of poor policy, how it devastates real families, communities and futures. They will speak to their fear that cost will go even higher, and the pain even deeper, if Bill C-69 passes as drafted.

They won’t go too deeply into policy suggestions but will speak about lost dreams and lost ambitions. The Senate committee will hear about families being torn apart, savings drained by lack of work, towns dissolving under the pressure of lost jobs, about highly trained professionals in the energy sector watching flawed social policy objectives and politics driving decisions rather than science and technical studies. 


Suits and Boots started a campaign to #KillBillC69 last September, shortly after the bill went to the Senate. Reading the bill, it was quickly apparent that rather than resolving issues and delays caused by the current rules for getting good, responsible resource projects approved it makes them worse.

Called the Impact Assessment Act, Bill C-69 introduced numerous new requirements proposed projects would have to meet during their review, many of them unrelated to the project itself, allows a cabinet minister to unilaterally cancel a project for political reasons even after years of expensive and time-consuming review, and opens up broad avenues for delaying lawsuits.

We all agree projects in Canada must live up to rigorous environmental and social standards. However, the process needs to give project proponents the certainty that if they come forward with a good project and consult properly, they will have a reasonable opportunity to get on with it. 

Why would a company invest billions of dollars into a project without any certainty it could proceed, when some politician can cancel their project at the 11th hour? They won’t. They’ll take their money somewhere else.

We hope the senators on this committee listen to Canadians’ voices.

The Senate has the power to kill C-69, send it back to the Liberal government for another try. The Senate has used this power to kill or turn back more than 200 bills since Confederation, including bills the House sent to it in the past few decades on major issues like abortion, free trade, GST and greenhouse gas regulation.

We are calling on them to again exercise their power of sober second thought, with the powerful, grassroots perspectives of our members in mind, and their voices in their heads.

We are asking them to hear the pain in the Prairies, and help make sure the hurting stops.

Rick Peterson is founder of Suits and Boots, a registered not-for-profit group of investment industry professionals and resource sectors workers and their families across Canada.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more