Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: In the sea of sleaze surrounding the Lavalin scandal, it is difficult for an observer to sort facts from fiction due to the sheer volume of fiction


Observing two months of SNC-Lavalin scandal has become a tiresome, soul-destroying trek. Make no mistake; this is a full-blown scandal of the sort that destroys governments, political careers and political parties.

There is ample evidence that the Prime Minister’s Office engaged in a campaign of coercion and threats to convince the Attorney General to intervene in our independent justice system and give Lavalin an escape from criminal proceedings.

When the Attorney General appeared before the Justice Committee and gave evidence of pressure put on her, Michel Wernick and Gerald Butts were called to testify that the Attorney General misinterpreted their efforts and did not understand their intent. Their efforts were aimed at diminishing the Attorney General’s character.

The Attorney General countered by producing further evidence to support her testimony which included the recording of a telephone conversation with Michael Wernick. Liberals leapt on the recording like drowning rats on floating debris. They condemned and denounced Wilson-Raybould having made the recording without Wernick’s consent or knowledge.

Wernick was engaged in intimidation of and threats to an elected representative and an officer of the crown. He was acting on behalf of the PMO which was engaged in an effort to interfere in the administration of justice. The Liberal caucus ignored all that and feasted on the former Attorney General like a school of piranha. They had an excuse to avoid having to answer embarrassing questions.

The media is now filled with rumours of the former Attorney General’s alleged demands on the Prime Minister and other shady dealings. The piranhas are not sated yet and will not be until Wilson-Raybould’s reputations is utterly destroyed.     

We cannot know that Jody Wilson-Raybould is blameless or that she does not have things she should be held accountable for. In the sea of sleaze surrounding the Lavalin scandal, it is difficult for an observer to sort facts from fiction due to the sheer volume of fiction.


We do know that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, through his PMO minions, was determined to make a political decisions on who will and will not be prosecuted for criminal activity. That concept is appalling. It is too close to political decisions to prosecute innocent people for alleged crimes. That is not a power any government can be allowed to hold in a lawful democracy.

The resignation of Gerald Butts and retirement of Wernick were not accidental or unrelated to the Lavalin scandal. Butts keep reappearing like a ghostly spectre from an old horror movie. He is active, bold and engaged for someone who allegedly resigned from the PMO. What else are we not being told?  

The Prime Minister sending appointed PMO operatives to represent his government, rather than his Ministers or other elected representatives, is troubling. His failure to personally confront accusations of improper conduct head-on is perplexing.

Errors can be forgiven; deceit cannot.

The government caucus is congratulating itself on having rid itself of Wilson-Raybould and Philpott, who broke the rules of caucus and cabinet solidarity (and secrecy) which is apparently unforgivable. Caucus members have chosen to continue swimming in a murky sea of sleazy, secret, under-the-table dealings which is not what the people who cast ballots expect of them.

They have failed us -- actions speak louder than words.


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more