Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: In the sea of sleaze surrounding the Lavalin scandal, it is difficult for an observer to sort facts from fiction due to the sheer volume of fiction


Observing two months of SNC-Lavalin scandal has become a tiresome, soul-destroying trek. Make no mistake; this is a full-blown scandal of the sort that destroys governments, political careers and political parties.

There is ample evidence that the Prime Minister’s Office engaged in a campaign of coercion and threats to convince the Attorney General to intervene in our independent justice system and give Lavalin an escape from criminal proceedings.

When the Attorney General appeared before the Justice Committee and gave evidence of pressure put on her, Michel Wernick and Gerald Butts were called to testify that the Attorney General misinterpreted their efforts and did not understand their intent. Their efforts were aimed at diminishing the Attorney General’s character.

The Attorney General countered by producing further evidence to support her testimony which included the recording of a telephone conversation with Michael Wernick. Liberals leapt on the recording like drowning rats on floating debris. They condemned and denounced Wilson-Raybould having made the recording without Wernick’s consent or knowledge.

Wernick was engaged in intimidation of and threats to an elected representative and an officer of the crown. He was acting on behalf of the PMO which was engaged in an effort to interfere in the administration of justice. The Liberal caucus ignored all that and feasted on the former Attorney General like a school of piranha. They had an excuse to avoid having to answer embarrassing questions.

The media is now filled with rumours of the former Attorney General’s alleged demands on the Prime Minister and other shady dealings. The piranhas are not sated yet and will not be until Wilson-Raybould’s reputations is utterly destroyed.     

We cannot know that Jody Wilson-Raybould is blameless or that she does not have things she should be held accountable for. In the sea of sleaze surrounding the Lavalin scandal, it is difficult for an observer to sort facts from fiction due to the sheer volume of fiction.


We do know that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, through his PMO minions, was determined to make a political decisions on who will and will not be prosecuted for criminal activity. That concept is appalling. It is too close to political decisions to prosecute innocent people for alleged crimes. That is not a power any government can be allowed to hold in a lawful democracy.

The resignation of Gerald Butts and retirement of Wernick were not accidental or unrelated to the Lavalin scandal. Butts keep reappearing like a ghostly spectre from an old horror movie. He is active, bold and engaged for someone who allegedly resigned from the PMO. What else are we not being told?  

The Prime Minister sending appointed PMO operatives to represent his government, rather than his Ministers or other elected representatives, is troubling. His failure to personally confront accusations of improper conduct head-on is perplexing.

Errors can be forgiven; deceit cannot.

The government caucus is congratulating itself on having rid itself of Wilson-Raybould and Philpott, who broke the rules of caucus and cabinet solidarity (and secrecy) which is apparently unforgivable. Caucus members have chosen to continue swimming in a murky sea of sleazy, secret, under-the-table dealings which is not what the people who cast ballots expect of them.

They have failed us -- actions speak louder than words.


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more