Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: In the sea of sleaze surrounding the Lavalin scandal, it is difficult for an observer to sort facts from fiction due to the sheer volume of fiction


Observing two months of SNC-Lavalin scandal has become a tiresome, soul-destroying trek. Make no mistake; this is a full-blown scandal of the sort that destroys governments, political careers and political parties.

There is ample evidence that the Prime Minister’s Office engaged in a campaign of coercion and threats to convince the Attorney General to intervene in our independent justice system and give Lavalin an escape from criminal proceedings.

When the Attorney General appeared before the Justice Committee and gave evidence of pressure put on her, Michel Wernick and Gerald Butts were called to testify that the Attorney General misinterpreted their efforts and did not understand their intent. Their efforts were aimed at diminishing the Attorney General’s character.

The Attorney General countered by producing further evidence to support her testimony which included the recording of a telephone conversation with Michael Wernick. Liberals leapt on the recording like drowning rats on floating debris. They condemned and denounced Wilson-Raybould having made the recording without Wernick’s consent or knowledge.

Wernick was engaged in intimidation of and threats to an elected representative and an officer of the crown. He was acting on behalf of the PMO which was engaged in an effort to interfere in the administration of justice. The Liberal caucus ignored all that and feasted on the former Attorney General like a school of piranha. They had an excuse to avoid having to answer embarrassing questions.

The media is now filled with rumours of the former Attorney General’s alleged demands on the Prime Minister and other shady dealings. The piranhas are not sated yet and will not be until Wilson-Raybould’s reputations is utterly destroyed.     

We cannot know that Jody Wilson-Raybould is blameless or that she does not have things she should be held accountable for. In the sea of sleaze surrounding the Lavalin scandal, it is difficult for an observer to sort facts from fiction due to the sheer volume of fiction.


We do know that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, through his PMO minions, was determined to make a political decisions on who will and will not be prosecuted for criminal activity. That concept is appalling. It is too close to political decisions to prosecute innocent people for alleged crimes. That is not a power any government can be allowed to hold in a lawful democracy.

The resignation of Gerald Butts and retirement of Wernick were not accidental or unrelated to the Lavalin scandal. Butts keep reappearing like a ghostly spectre from an old horror movie. He is active, bold and engaged for someone who allegedly resigned from the PMO. What else are we not being told?  

The Prime Minister sending appointed PMO operatives to represent his government, rather than his Ministers or other elected representatives, is troubling. His failure to personally confront accusations of improper conduct head-on is perplexing.

Errors can be forgiven; deceit cannot.

The government caucus is congratulating itself on having rid itself of Wilson-Raybould and Philpott, who broke the rules of caucus and cabinet solidarity (and secrecy) which is apparently unforgivable. Caucus members have chosen to continue swimming in a murky sea of sleazy, secret, under-the-table dealings which is not what the people who cast ballots expect of them.

They have failed us -- actions speak louder than words.


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more