Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: A bit of Quebec History

Claude Bélanger, Department of History, Marianopolis College has done an interesting study of Jean Lesage and the Quiet Revolution (1960-66) which is well worth the read.

Although many people are familiar with the term ‘Quiet Revolution’ few are really familiar with just what that entailed.

Quebecers had suffered decades of oppression and regulation that reached a point of causing a rebellion against church and state as practiced by the Duplessis regime.
Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau being questioned
after introducing the War Measures Act (10/16/1970)

Unlike most rebellion, the Quebec version was primarily intellectual and social excepting for the minority hotheads who led Quebec into the October 1970 crisis and enactment of the War Measures Act.

What is more intriguing is how Jean Lesage managed to wrest a degree of political anonymity from the federal government. There are several lessons therein for all provinces to consider, but many have been lost in misreading of how Quebec secured anonymity and set a series of precedents.

Most of us incorrectly assume that we have a representation by population system, but Quebec is separately treated, other provinces with a population of over 2.5 million (Alberta, British Columbia and Ontario) are treated differently from those with a population of between 1.5 and 2.5 million (none at present) and those with population under 1.5 million (Manitoba, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island & Saskatchewan).


The system favours smaller provinces.

Successive federal governments have insisted that the federal government is superior to, and above, the provinces. This is, at best, only partially true and restricted to matters under federal jurisdiction, and a few not articulated in the constitution.

For the most part, provinces have not fully exercised their constitutional powers, in part as those powers entail responsibilities. Quebec is the exception in that regard at present.

Western Canadians are awakening to the need for a different deal with the federal government. The system is not working for them.

In future articles we will explore the options provinces have and how they relate to federal powers and responsibilities.

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba







Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nurses Take Job Action After Years of NDP Neglect

Image Credit:  BC Nurses Union BC nurses have reached a breaking point after years of unsafe conditions, rising violence in the workplace and a government that wouldn’t listen. Now they are on the picket line fighting to be heard. Last week, nurses began job action with a 72-hour strike notice, refusing non-essential overtime and stepping back from non-nursing duties. As of Tuesday, they have escalated to picket lines for the first time in decades. This moment was avoidable. It is the result of years of unanswered concerns from the frontline workers who keep our hospitals running. Nurses have been raising the same concerns for years: unsafe staffing levels, rising violence on the job, and a workload no single person should have to carry. None of it is new, and none of it should have taken a strike vote to get the government's attention. "Nurses are exercising their legal right to job action, but it shouldn’t have had to come to this," said Kiel Giddens, MLA for...
Post a Comment
Read more

British Columbians Still Don’t Know Who’s Paying for NDP’s BC Hydro Deal

The NDP is making billion-dollar promises with BC Hydro, but British Columbians still don’t know who will pay the bill. Last week’s memorandum of understanding isn’t what the federal government and the NDP are making it out to be. It’s an admission that the NDP failed to make the long-term investments needed to keep B.C. powered. Now British Columbians have serious questions about the cost and whether BC Hydro ratepayers will end up paying the price. David L. Williams, MLA for Salmon Arm-Shuswap and Shadow Minister for BC Hydro and Electrical Energy Development , said British Columbians deserve clear answers about the full implications of the Canada–British Columbia Cooperative Prosperity Agreement. “British Columbians deserve the full truth,” said Mr. Williams. “This multi-billion-dollar announcement does not answer who pays for cost overruns, who pays for new generation, who carries the risk if industrial customers do not materialize, or whether ratepayers will be forced ...
Post a Comment
Read more

NDP Government Blames Everyone but Themselves

The federal government has announced new measures to support British Columbia's forestry sector, including $65 million in funding for projects across the province. While any support is welcome, it falls far short of the level of assistance other provinces have secured for key industries. Conservative Forests Critic Ward Stamer says the NDP government needs to take responsibility for its mismanagement of B.C.’s forest industry instead of trying to pass on the blame. Despite promising to create more jobs in the forest sector, the NDP government has overseen the loss of thousands of forestry jobs and 21 mill closures which have devastated communities. “If Premier Eby spent more time addressing the regulatory issues impacting the forestry sector than he did complaining about the federal government, we would not be in the position we are now,” said Stamer. “And instead of trying to place the blame for mill closures on Donald Trump, Minister of Forests Ravi Parmar should t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more