Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ERIN OTOOLE: While the SNC scandal is deeply troubling to many observers, it is not even the most serious example of the Trudeau government’s disregard for the rule of law


Over the last few months, Canadians have been transfixed by the SNC Lavalin scandal. What began as a headline in the Globe & Mail alongside flat denials by the Prime Minister, led to the resignation of two top Liberal cabinet ministers. The self-styled “feminist” Prime Minister was forced to toss two of his best MPs out of the Liberal caucus in a clear effort to save his political skin. For many Canadians it was the first time the curtain was pulled back on Justin Trudeau and his team.

Vice - Admiral Mark Norman
While conduct in the SNC scandal is deeply troubling to many observers, it is not even the most serious example of the Trudeau government’s disregard for the rule of law. In my view, that distinction goes to the Admiral Mark Norman affair, where the liberty of an honourable Canadian is at stake.

Vice-Admiral Mark Norman has served thirty-eight years in the Canadian Armed Forces. He was the second highest ranking official in our military and has been decorated by Canada and our allies. Like so many members of the Canadian Armed Forces, Norman grew up in a military family. Therefore, his entire life has been spent either serving Canada himself, or as part of a military family serving the country.

This is why I believe that the Admiral Norman affair is far more disturbing than the SNC scandal. One deals with a corporation and efforts by the Liberal government to assist it, while the other deals with one of our best citizens and actions by the Liberal government that have hindered his legal rights.

The roots of this affair take us back to the very origin story of the Trudeau government. We all remember the carefully staged stroll up Rideau Hall for Trudeau and his cabinet. He pledged they would be “transparent by default”, yet within days they were secretly interfering in a $700 million naval contract.


In November 2015, the House of Commons had not yet been sworn in following the election, but one or more Liberal Ministers attempted to halt a contract in their first cabinet meeting. The contract at issue was one geared at getting our Navy a much-needed supply ship after fire had taken our last remaining one out of service.

We might not even know about the interference in this first cabinet meeting were it not for the reporting of a CBC journalist. James Cudmore wrote about the cabinet review of the contract and the interventions by private industry that came before the cabinet meeting. The CBC stories by Cudmore led to two things. First, the government decided to proceed with the original contract. And second, James Cudmore stopped reporting for the CBC.

In a move that raised many eyebrows, Cudmore accepted a job from the Liberal government weeks later. He went from covering defence issues as a journalist to advising the Liberal Defence Minister.

The leaks surrounding the shipbuilding contract led to a furor in Ottawa and an investigation revealed that dozens of people were aware of details from the cabinet meeting. A year later, Mark Norman was suspended from his job as Vice-Chief of Defence Staff. He was charged with a single charge of breach of trust a year after his suspension.

I have yet to hear any reasonable suggestion as to what personal benefit Mark Norman would have received in relation to this alleged breach of trust. The Crown will need to prove this element of the offence and I don’t think that ensuring his naval comrades got “the kit” they needed is going to cut it.

The troubling pattern of apparent interference by the Trudeau government arose before charges were laid.

On two separate occasions, the Prime Minister alluded to the fact that criminal charges were likely against Mark Norman. Either he misspoke on two occasions, or he was aware of details related to the investigation. Even worse is the fact that the Trudeau government resisted disclosure of documents needed by Admiral Norman for his defence.

After months of pressure, the government finally agreed to let the judge review the documents for relevance, but this made the process slow. The judge also chastised the government for releasing duplicate documents that bogged down the review. Court documents have also revealed that the Privy Council Office appears to have been getting updates from the prosecution team on “trial strategy” in a manner that Norman’s lawyers have suggested was improper.

The most disturbing part of the Norman affair is its similarities to the Ontario gas plant scandal.

Not only are many of the principal players from the Ontario Liberal team working in the Trudeau government, but lawyers at the Norman trial are raising questions about practices that appear similar to those used in the gas plant scandal.

In the gas plant scandal, the McGuinty government used code words like “Apple” and “Vapour”, which had the effect of delaying or avoiding disclosure of documents. Admiral Norman’s lawyers have been asking witnesses about code words like “Kraken” or “CN3” and whether officials within the Defence Department or the Prime Minister’s Office used code words to avoid disclosure.

It will be up to the court to determine whether code words were used. or whether there was inappropriate direction from the Prime Minister and his advisors in the Admiral Norman affair, but after the SNC scandal you will understand why many observers don’t give them the benefit of the doubt.

Conservative MP Erin O'Toole
Until the trial is complete or charges withdrawn, Admiral Mark Norman marches into court and not across the parade square. I hope he gets justice and until then I salute him for his service and tremendous resilience throughout this terrible ordeal.



Erin O’Toole is the Member of Parliament for the riding of Durham (Ontario) and the Official Opposition Shadow Minister for Foreign Affairs and International Development.

He was first elected to Parliament in a 2012 by-election and re-elected in the 2015 general election.

In the Conservative government he served as the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of International Trade before his appointment to cabinet as Canada’s Minister of Veterans Affairs.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more